It stretches the imagination to think that 233 years ago, our forefathers knew more than we do! I can believe it.

If Congress passes a law for term limits for Justices, can't Justices declare it unconstitutional, protecting their own jobs? This is almost funny if not sad.

Celebrity Deathmatch!
The Senators vs. The Supremes!!!

I don't see any SCOTUS decisions that endanger the republic, at least recently. The decision on Roe vs Wade reflected the opinion of late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, that it was on thin constitutional ice to begin with, and that it would have been better to let the issue evolve at the state level.

The decision that pointed out the EPA overreach, usurping congressional authority to invoke regulatory restrictions without foundation on a legislative basis has yet to be recognized as the hammer it is. That ruling should be the basis for denying any number of executive agencies in the government the dictatorial powers they've assumed, in violation of the Constitution.

The ruling against the restrictions on gun ownership and the right of self protection in the state of New York was a clear defense of the 2nd amendment (one which may become even more important if the wheels come off the national wagon).

The only ruling I was disappointed in recently was the persistent defense of Obamacare. I suppose that has its roots in the Chief Justice Roberts original decision to find a way not to declare it unconstitutional.

Our founding fathers did everything in their powers to protect us from ourselves!
There are so many things today that go in direct opposition of the Constitution yet we have a SCOTUS that seems unable to read and follow explicit laws, rules and instructions.

They just don't get, don't want to get or don't want you to get, that the Law is EXACTLY as written and that is the only job of the SCOTUS is to judge according to what is WRITTEN in the Law!

Frankly, I fail to understand what is wrong or deficient with life in accordance with the constitution.

It seems to me that social justice, no cash bail, fairness, and progressive paradise are all made up contracts. They're fairy tales, or participation trophies for people who believe in Robin hood. The truth is even in Robin hoods day the rich avoided being robbed and continued to get rich because he knew how.

Happily they can be impeached.

I hadn't thought of that but you do have a good point. Actually it would probably take an Amendment to the Constitution to put in term limits for the Supremes.