Was this really a surprise to anyone?

The government must state that there were no consumer files present - because if there were, they would be fined (by the government) and required to send out notifications to every individual who _might_ have been compromised. HIPAA has been very strict about this, charging fines: Theft of an unencrypted laptop in 2012 containing 148 sets of patient data (to be used for research) generated a fine of $250,000.

It would be amusing to see the government chase its tail, fining itself into an abyss, over this. Perhaps we can watch...

Jan

The administration and the media are saying this is so insignificant that it wouldn't have even been reported if it had been anyone else. So there!!!

Whoops, I almost forgot, does anyone remember anything about the reports and the media's take on, "You can keep your insurance", or "You can keep your doctor"? "We did not target anyone, it was just a couple rouge agents", "ISIS is just the JV", "It wasn't a terrorist attack it was a video", or any of the other things these people try to get us to believe.

How are we expected to believe anything this administration or the mainstream media puts out anymore. Is it really true now that salt is good for you? Why was it bad before? Should I eat eggs or not? I'm more confused today than I ever was.

And weren't there a lot of warnings from computer gurus and Congress alike that this would happen way before it ever began?

How many times has this web site been breached that we don't know about? LifeLock Ultimate is a wise decision right now.

Finally someone actually got in.

I wonder if the hacker first got PO'd because his mama found the Affordable Heath Care to be extremely unaffordable in her case. Mama, papa, brother, sister, friend, relatives et als or some combination thereof.

is there any information worth while there