Judge Jackson: 'I Do Not Hold a Position on Whether Individuals Possess Natural Rights' | CNSNews
And the reality that a scotus candidate is not belittled and laughed out the room underscores the depth of the cancer in the fabric of this nation.
- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
A so-called Reverend race hustler Al Sharpton suddenly springs to mind.
Me dino mind can be kinda quirky for sniffing out things that may relate.
It blew my mind when I saw BrainDead on TV saying, "You know, someday the white race will no longer be the majority. And is gonna' be great! It's the source of our strength!
I contend we are on a highway traveling at break-neck speeds and too damn stupid to stop.
And that was before the Jackass Party got stupid about allowing wide open borders.
Of course, you'd have to be the Committee Chair or you'd be ruled Out of Order...
She can't defend the US Constitution since she has no understanding of it.
Since she lets convicted sex offenders off with light sentences, she doesn't
understand the law, the only area that she claims to have any expertise.
Obviously she would have no argument against being blamed for the actions
of her ancestors who took others of her ancestors into slavery in Africa.
Since she is at fault for such actions, she must be punished appropriately,
for enslaving others.
Her purpose for pursuing the position of SCOTUS judge must be to follow
in the footsteps of the slaver ancestors and enslave some Americans to
benefit others. Using her unearned, position of power for that horrid purpose
is a high crime and requires that the greatest punishment be applied.
What is the punishment for enslavement of innocents and treason?[/s]
To me, there ought to be a way to outright disqualify candidates who appear before the Senate who simply refuse to answer questions. I'm still trying to picture what form that would take, but I think that the notion of stonewalling and "filibustering" (not an appropriate use of the term for a nominee) to run out one's time of questioning should be met with unequivocal dismissal and disqualification.
Yep. When partisanship matters more than policy, the government is already beyond recovery.
But that's a technicality. Her stated lack of position says to me that she thinks we do Not have Individual Rights unless government Simon Says So.
10th Amendment renders what they did illegal.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitut...
This is the crux of the issue that Lincoln violated in 1860 when by force of arms
he forced free people who wished to go their separate way (as allowed as states
rights in the law of the land) to remain in an involuntary forced union.
Those previously free men were allowed no voice in the changes made
to the law of the land removing their states' rights and enslaving everyone
for posterity.
No one in government has the authority to remove individual rights.
That was the argument of those founders who insisted that the Bill of Rights
be added to the constitution - against the outcry of the monarchists who wanted
a powerful central government like those found in Europe.
No one in government has the authority to remove individual rights.
Unfortunately, the government does have the power to do so and to enforce
such tyranny.
Franklin when asked replied "A republic, if you can keep it." I think any answer comes from the meaning of that statement, if one is even possible.
I have no solution as to how we get back or how we enforce natural rights anymore. Transgression is the name of the game coming from DC. We are a degenerate nation that deserves wrath. Frankly, I'm embarrassed ever to have served.
Ideally, any elected official should innately recognize that natural rights are inviolate, but one of the key elements of the Founders' view was to recognize humans are flawed, and the structure they established was intended to be able to respond to unlawful behavior by government officials. That's why, when the issue of the SCOTUS not having been specifically authorized to make rulings on constitutionality of government actions came up, I asked who then, under the structure laid out in the Constitution, should make those judgements.
Ideally, every American citizen should be respectful of the natural rights of every other citizen, but we are human. When someone in a position of authority abuses their power and violates the natural rights of a citizen without the power to overcome that abuse, I have no doubt the Founders had in mind a mechanism to correct that. Given the means of abuse available to the Executive and Legislative elements of our government, it seems proper that the Judicial branch should act as the shield against such abuses. Again, I'm addressing original intent, not our current degraded situation.
Of course for today's audience, several segments steered into his treatment of slavery. Overall, it was a decent production, since the Founders did address the problem but could only open the door to abolition on the margins in order to establish the union.
One could say that, between the Fed and WEF, we're all slaves now.
The Federal Government is anything but that. That said
Congress has limited enforcement authority for the fourteenth amendment .
U.S. Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson secured the support of two more Senate Republicans on Monday, as she cleared a procedural hurdle toward becoming the first Black woman to serve on the nation's top judicial body.
Republicans Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney joined Susan Collins in saying they would vote to confirm Jackson, 51, to a lifetime seat on the court later this week. They also supported a procedural 53-47 vote to bring her nomination to the Senate floor after the Senate Judiciary Committee deadlocked 11-11 along party lines on whether to advance the nomination.
Murkowski and Romney, who do not serve on the Judiciary Committee, announced their backing of Jackson as the Senate began voting to "discharge" the nomination from the panel, propelling it to the full Senate
cause to come to a resolution.
make a choice from a number of alternatives.
Definition of Judge
a public official appointed to DECIDE cases in a court of law
A lifetime appointment to the Highest Court Sen Cruz “Nominee Black Woman, what is a woman?” Pro pedo file Black Woman responds “ I can’t decide”
Majority of pedo file Senators respond. “YOUR HIRED”
A black women as The fraud in chief said he wanted.
I wonder if he heard that somewhere .....hmm perhaps and it stuck in his non cognitive
Mush between his fake ears. Perhaps Hunter was ordering an escort and the big guy got confused.