- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Along with the boycott (for the record I have not missed a thing, including the lame Star Wars pastiches Disney has spewed at us,) we should take this as a cue to do some no-compromise activism: Reclaim the language as gender-specific, including (gasp!) the default to gender-male pronouns.
Each person will have to decide how comfortable he is with this (see what I did there?) but I recommend:
- Rejecting out of hand the practice of defaulting to the grammar-obliterating plurals of "they" or "their";
- Always using gender-specific pronouns, regardless of context, based on the gender of the subject at hand;
- As above, defaulting to gender-male in any case where gender is indeterminate - not as a "chauvinistic" intent but as a simple continuation of standard linguistic practice (for which practice there was never evidence in support of "chauvinism" in any case.) Or default to gender-female if you want - though the change is itself tends to be jarring and evocative of group-think.
If you want to go whole hog, below your signature line in your emails make up and append your own "custom pronouns." I once put "Bloortz / Schplaad / Zooble" beneath mine at work. HR was not amused. So I replied that the courts are on our side:
https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/04/0...
... linked to the ruling itself:
https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opin...
... but thereafter left it out, point having been made. Outside of work there should be no such constraints, I'm thinking.
Addendum: Back in 2016 Libertarian commentator J.C. Bourgue penned an excellent article on the subject, both hilarious and insightful - bookmarking recommended:
https://thefederalist.com/2016/09/05/...
.
.