- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
I am not so certain that it is necessary to be debt free, however: I recall my mother saying that during the Great Depression, anyone who made ANY payment on their mortgage (even a dollar a month) was left alone by the mortgage company...because there were so many people who could not pay anything. So I think my version of 'be debt free' is to 'invest in yourself' and try to be able to pay something on your debts during crisis, so that you are not in the target zone.
Jan
the Fed, of course, per Dem policy! -- j
Two ways I try to help my students wrap their minds around that continually ascending figure is tell them Labron James should pay off the debt than I divide his salary by the debt and they learn that he needs to make his current salary for over the next 3000 years.
Well that's not going to work so I target the top 1% and show them an article (wsj or biz week) and the best figure I can come up with is the top 16,000 families have a total wealth of 6 trillion.
We can take all the $$ from the top 1% and still would not even come close to paying the beast off.
Math is off the top of my head from a lesson I did last school year.
Have a great day!
Seriously, I think your math lesson is practically perfect. What is the age level of your students?
Cheers
This is a great lesson. Even if you target the top 10% and want them to pay for most of the military, everyone's healthcare, everyone's education, service the debt, it just doesn't work out. And you run into the issue that people at the bottom of the top decile aren't _that_ rich, so it seems harsh that they should be paying for the decile below them. Okay, so may be 2nd and 3rd deciles should pay their own way an the top decile should pay for the bottom six. The more you dig into it, the clearer it becomes that it doesn't work. It's not about politics; the numbers don't work.
Next summer my Dear Wife and I have penciled in a cruise that ends in not-so jolly old england ( capital E rejected) and my plan if there is a J M Keynes statute, is to throw an egg and hit that idiots form in the head and celebrate I am alive and he dead.
I am in a big way in favor of state conventions demanding a balanced budget amendment. But something tells me....the leviathan must eat, the leviathan will find a way.
Hey let's have some fun!
Yes, I have had loans in the past, and have also used them poorly at times, and wisely others. (Wise is using someone elses money at rates I can make money from, or to cover an 'opportunity' where I can save more by financing it - hopefully short term - than the interest/overhead cost me). (Poorly was when I got into credit card debt in the late 70's - but getting it paid off was a breath of fresh air, and I don't want to go there again!) - Right now, no loans and don't want any if possible.
People have been saying this all my life. I first heard about it in '87 with the stock market crash and rising debt. Since this all kinds of amazing positive developments have happened. The debt is worse now, but people will muddle through, rising to the occasion when it becomes and immediate problem.
Circumstances are far different than what they were before Obama took office. The size of the debt, the state of the economy, the lawlessness in the Administration - none of these are something we have ever seen before.
:)