Faucci's Defense of Lying
You lied to us for your perception of the public good. We pay you for that? Really?
And how then should one interpret what you say in the future. I know what I will do, just what anyone should do with someone who lies, assume what you are saying is a lie, until one does their own analysis. Therefore, as a public servant, you are completely useless. Therefore, you should be fired.
This is an indefensible position for a government employee.
And how then should one interpret what you say in the future. I know what I will do, just what anyone should do with someone who lies, assume what you are saying is a lie, until one does their own analysis. Therefore, as a public servant, you are completely useless. Therefore, you should be fired.
This is an indefensible position for a government employee.
They didn’t trust liars back then, so why would anyone trust a liar these days?
is that the government (We The People) pays Creepy Fauci more than the POTUS. Why is he not sacked?
Government is a Lair of liars!
The second was his first grilling by Rand Paul in August of last year where Paul cited all the evidence from Europe that schools were safe to open. Fauci agreed with Paul in that hearing, yet only days later appeared on the morning shows to advocate against opening up schools. (I add that Paul's second grilling only recently was just as impressive as Paul pushed Fauci to show ANY data supporting his position - and couldn't.)
Third was his disavowal of hydroxychloroquine despite a 2005 study which showed that HCL was both safe and effective - even when taken preventatively - against SARS-based virii. Can't get more specific. What was even more telling about this lie was that only days after Biden's inauguration, the CDC reversed case, said they were wrong about HCL and re-instated it.
No doubt you are correct about his motivations. Unfortunately, like "hate crimes", motivations should be wholly irrelevant to the crime.
Doktor Faucila more than often lies with creepy smile as would a mad scientist in a horror B-movie.
All he lacks is a Transylvanian accent.
Not sure but I think I watched it two or three times on some late Saturday night horror movie show. Can't recall Elvira ever showing this during the Eighties.
For the second time since the Seventies I read Bram Stoker's novel, Dracula, just last year. Love how Stoker strung pages from diaries, letters and a doomed ship's log together to make a novel-length story.
Except, the only problem with this explanation is that hospitals and doctors ALREADY GET PRIORITY FOR MASKS, because they have corporate contracts with the manufacturers.
Think about it folks, when was the last time you saw a surgeon in scrubs at Home Depot?
The entire event had one objective - To ensure Trump failed to get reelected, which was a surety until COVID.
Now the Orwellian Deep State and Made-up-Media are trying to figure out how to put dispel the fear they created and leveraged, without admitting the whole weather forecast was a hoax.
It is best to know the difference between what you know and what you don't know, and not to push when you "don't know".
However, in Fauxi's case, he was speaking to an audience who rightfully expected the truth out of him, as that is what he was paid (quite handsomely) to do....tell the truth.
In any case, if you consider me ethically inappropriate, I guess that's okay. That makes two areas we disagree on, and yet....I still like you! People can have differences and still be of good will.
Objectively speaking, it is illogical to choose to lie in general, since it will reduce your own credibility which has value to you. Lying in specific may be different, for example, explaining to a 2 yr old what happened to the fish or hamster.