- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Direct download from telegram app
You have some issue on your end. The download works from https://michaeljlindell.com/
The browser handled it perfectly even though it was a lot slower than the maximum of our bandwidth. (Serious bandwidth these days in urban areas is 100Mb/sec or higher.)
I recommend Vivaldi browser if you are interested.
I can put a 1.5gb x265 version on my server if need be; might even be able to compress it further if I relax the quality a bit.
Wouldn't want to lose the clarity of the text charts though.
And, also on BitChute, here's a 16-minute follow-up => https://www.bitchute.com/video/YJ5qvr...
I did not look at it but have read critical comment esp on EpochTimes (from memory). The article says- To a skeptic it is not proof, it shows very little documentation. There is much emotion, exclamations and strong words, all that is not proof however dramatically presented.
The argument presented is interesting, there is good proof available on widespread fraud, but this is not it.
Sites where still available, see-
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking...
Vote spikes. Compelling but not proof. Easily explained (got round) by mail-in ballots coming in - fake ballots with no tracking history, but that is not proof of fraud either .
There are a good number of instances with very strong proof of fraud (to me). Some members of the SC would now be going over these carefully for get-outs. Whatever the finding, there will be no result cancellation.
They claim to have the data showing manipulation of votes from hundreds of internet addresses internationally (60% from China) and changing votes from Trump to Buydem in what appears to be hundreds of voting machines. They could not prove that data to be true in a video, but the source data should absolutely be investigated. If it is accurate it is absolute proof of election theft by foreign manipulation (and possibly with domestic conspirators.)
Optimally a real unbiased investigation will uncover those who were complicit. Sub-optimally, the investigation could uncover that the election was stolen but without proof of fraud by domestic conspirators.
The video was created, imo, to get enough people to insist that the allegations be investigated by impartial unbiased investigators with the authorization of the SCOTUS.
I agree with you that probably nothing will be done by any government agency, con-gress, or group because they are corrupt.
imo, it's up to the People with the backing of the military to investigate, and, if proven,overturn the theft, by force in necessary.