The Two Biggest Myths About mRNA Vaccines
NVIC-National Vaccine Information Center...seems to be speaking truth
Added Content: 5/19/21; https://wethepeopleconvention.org/art...
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/art...
AH,,,AND THEY DIDN'T KNOW THIS???
Added Content: 5/19/21; https://wethepeopleconvention.org/art...
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/art...
AH,,,AND THEY DIDN'T KNOW THIS???
The infraction? My answer to a thread commenter: "There are at least two *(and probably more) very effective treatments for Covid. You should be asking why they aren't available."
These tech companies have gotten too big for their britches.
https://cure4cancel.com/
Boy, it' a good sign that your in pain after getting the vaccine, sounds more like Post Modern illogic to me.
Some of those symptoms, eg the fever- high temperature, have been observed to correlate with production of antibodies.
Not everyone will experience discomfort while this is happening.
Is the statement saying antibodies are worthless?
Just how would you investigate the goodness
to the body other than the final result of the treatment.
Don't remember anyone getting the flu From the flu shot.
could be wrong.
If-
the vax works by increasing antibodies. But, there is an initial decrease, low for 2 weeks, then build up. Immunity is lower while the antibody level is lower.
Glad my wife and I stayed away from the mrna shots...my body doesn't like Anything allopathic in nature anyway.
About 31,500
Plus, the NIH (I think) stated that they suspect that only 1% of adverse reactions are reported.
At the Hospice where I work, 95% of the people that got P and M vaccines had bad reactions and most were out sick for several days. One young man died 2 days after his second shot of M.
The other odd thing is that after a year of this bull and about a 1000 visitors a month, we never observed covid in our people, patients nor guests.
Personally, I think the biggest mistake was the one which allowed Pfizer and Moderna to offer these treatments as "vaccines" in the first place given that they don't confer immunity. They should have been forced to offer their products as what they are: a risk-mitigation strategy primarily for those at higher risk from the pathogen, ie 60+ with other serious health conditions.
The main problem with the mRNA vaccines was the FDA not allowing an actual test of effectiveness. They allowed a test of two groups, one vaccinated and on not vaccinated. Then observed the numbers of infected in each group while going about their business. Found that the vaccine was 95% effective. Meaning that large numbers of vaccinated cases could still occur. I read that the companies would have preffered to do an actual test by exposing the vaccinated group, after some time to allow antibodies to be produce, to the virus. There was fear that someone might be hurt by such a procedure. So now the actual test is being done on hundreds of millions of people. I am not certain as to how efficacious the vaccine has been due to some natural decrease in the disease could also be involved.
That is still being reviewed. According to the information posted above, the only claims made by Pfizer and Moderna were that their treatments ameliorated symptoms - not that they conferred immunity. If one remembers, that was another reason why some were saying that the shots may have to be a recurring thing (every six months).
"The main problem with the mRNA vaccines was the FDA not allowing an actual test of effectiveness."
That's what happens when the government grants an emergency use exception without the normal clinical trials. Yes, those trials would have required another 3-5 years. A choice had to be made. The choice was to opt for an immediate response and hoping for limited severe consequences. I simply say that all of this should have been made public with the offering of the treatments. Two of my wife's friends died from getting the shots and her sister nearly followed them. IMHO there have been more than enough severe adverse reactions (blood clots, etc.) to warrant a recall of the treatments pending further testing and study, but they are being pushed now for political/control purposes (vaccine passports, etc.)
I have not seen anything about blood clots from the mANA vaccines, but rather related to the J&J vaccine in a small number of cases.
With respect to my sister-in-law, she got her second shot just before joining us for Spring Break (she and her family were escaping Portland). She continued to get more and more miserable the entire week. Upon returning, the doctors immediately admitted her and pumped 11 pounds of fluid out of her abdomen and shot her full of heavy antibiotics. (To note: she's a health nut and 11 pounds is probably 10% of her body weight. We have a picture from my father-in-law's birthday celebration and she is in notably-poor condition. You can see the bulge in her stomach and it doesn't look natural.)
Now you can be as skeptical as you want, but the ONLY change any of the three had in their lives in the applicable time frame was the "shot." I'm going with Occam's razor because I am not privileged enough to have the coroner's reports.
Besides, if there is a definitely good result for choosing to be vaccinated compared to possible adverse effects from not being vaccinated then get vaccinated. Bad accidents can happen, that is part of life. Don't get into feeling, what a "good boy am I", thinking that you are helping humanity. Just help yourself by getting all the information available about the vaccine and choosing to take it or not. The key word is 'choosing', not just go by what your told or doing patriotic servitude to the government. No government, at least, in the USA, is forcing anyone, except for military or others in chosen servitude, to get the vaccine injection. I don't like the term 'jab' because it is euphemism to make the injection seem like no substance is being placed within the body.
Since I am alone and home bound I am waiting to see which vaccine turns out safest and efficacious. I expect side effects just as there are side effects due to the immune system making antibodies for the SARS CoV 2 virus.
I don't drink Koolaid like those Jim Jones followers who did so in the name of that God you refer to.
It means,
do not make explanations needlessly complex.
If there were deaths after the shot, check out what the shot does as an explanation, first.