I DO like INFOWARS. Except when they get off on the religion thing.

And We Know has some info on this. Forward to 12:56 https://www.bitchute.com/video/xEjfBi...

Do you think it is actuarily possible that 200,000 people voted for Biden with not one Trump vote in the package? N

My radar goes off on this one.

I found it and am listening to it right now before I saw your post...you beat me to it, touche, Brother.

If this is true, it is truly brilliant! and sick stomach will begin to subside.

Keep in mind that Buyden supporters control a lot of the internet. I will not be surprised if it is clamped down severely by Big Tech if the evidence against the left is strong. Be prepared. Perhaps a phone tree is an alternative.

Another friend just sent this video on this "sting" topic :
https://banned.video/watch?id=5fa480cc65f2d419a08b54e2
This video is the same as the one in the main title but not on youtube.

I have some serious doubts on both the watermarking and GPS reports:

On Watermarking: Ballots are produced at the state or city/town level and are unique at least to the state legislative district. Some cities or towns can have their own ballot initiative questions or offices standing for election. Adding watermarking / serialization would involve the cooperation of a huge number of private printing companies.

On GPS: GPS is a send-only technology. The satellites send a very accurate time and location signal, the GPS receiver receives these signals from at least 4 satellites and does a very complex geometry calculation (including accounting for the speed of light) to determine its location. After all that, the receiver knows where it is (and doesn't have to tell anyone). There's no way you could incorporate a GPS receiver into a ballot, never mind a separate communications system to report the location to an outside receiver.

I'm not sure of the law (and it will vary state-by-state) but are informal ballots (don't use the official form, but make your choice plainly known) valid?

Here's the verification that can be done without using any of the above:

Get a list of those registered to vote.
- Check that list for people who died (either recently or in the distant past)
- Check that list for people who registered elsewhere when they moved.
- Check for the number of people registered at an address versus the reasonable living capacity at that address.
(don't immediately disqualify -- go check it out)
Get the number of people who voted (names checked off as voted on the election register).
- in person on Election Day
- by early voting at the town hall.
- by mail-in ballot / absentee voting.
Get the number of ballots cast
- in person on Election Day
- by early voting at the town hall.
- by mail-in ballot / absentee voting.
Signature check for mail-in ballots -- doesn't need to match exactly but should be 'close enough' or not an obvious non-match.
Voters should equal votes (a SMALL discrepency can be allowed due to human imperfection) for each class.
Ensure that people who try to vote both in person and mail-in are handled reasonably
(either disallow in-person voting or throw away the mail-in ballot)
(throw away mail-in ballot is preferred as it can override a fraudulent mail-in ballot, just tell voter about it)

Number of voters must be less than (or the extremely unlikely equal to) the number registered.

No American should accept this election, libertarian, democrat or republican. We need to demand total nullification and redo with voter ID. No president can lead after this total fraud. #fraud #redo #voteridnow #nullification2020
https://parler.com/post/0bbabd21e1694...

Voting result- do not believe as currently reported.
Voting patterns- impossible.
Fraud- Yes and big.
Steve P-crackpot.

Sting using high tech blockchain watermarks and GPS - why bother when it could be used to stop fraud as it occurs?

Yes, I am a skeptic, sounds to me as another Q type story- I would scream with delirious delight if it happens that way.

Have any of these predictions actually happened?
Have those predictions been useful in any way?
Could it be some big noting fiction writer?
Or, worse than that, some malicious intent?

X22report talking about the watermarks, 34:10, A guy from calif office of tech assessment confirmed. https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZdWbQd...

Also, here is the USPS whistle blower: https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...

This is confirmed in several ways. The Trump HS and DOEE got a paptent approved last year for a proprietary blockchain solution for ballots that is the watermark thing. I am not sure how it works, but they say it was deployed this year. If a ballot does not have it, it is fake. They have evidence of where the fake ballots were printed (not here), and the only way to get the people who refuse to open their minds and think for themselves to see is to make the fraud so blatant and clear, it cannot be denied.
Fakebook is censoring heavily, links to web sites they deem "dangerous" are blocked ("You cannot post this link on Fakebook" message). Now, for a for profit company, who makes money on eyes on ads, why would they delete a 1.5 million member group?
Why was Arizona called so early?
Why did a Wisconsin elections offical take home thousands of ballots for 1.5 days and be "unreachable"?
The answer will be Voter ID, one person, one vote.
We will see how well the Plan works over the next few weeks.

Go watch Dave at X22Report.com and listen to his reports, he makes it very clear and easy to understand, and ha the data to back up his logic.

https://x22report.com/