As Per My Early COVID Studies

Posted by $ Abaco 4 years, 3 months ago to Science
21 comments | Share | Flag

I dove into studying this virus before it hit America. In that research I found a whitepaper from Wuhan about attempting to mesh a coronavirus with HIV to see what happens...and how much deadlier it could make it. That research is mentioned in this video. As is the relevance of hydroxychloroquine. This video will disappear very soon. I hope the guest interviewee doesn't.

SOURCE URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HP7wmfqGHc


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 3 months ago
    Thanks, Abaco. Interesting discussion. Apparently it is well known in the military weapons research that HCQ can be used to prevent COVID virus from spreading, and US medical professionals support its use to treat COVID in early stages.
    ๐Ÿ‘
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Commander 4 years, 3 months ago
    This reminds me of the film War Games, Mathew Broderick. Joshua, the computer, at the end of "simulation": "the only way to win is not to play the game"
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 3 months ago
      My business partner did the electronics special effects on Wargames.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Commander 4 years, 3 months ago
        Enjoyed those effects immensely. A lot of theater background when I was younger.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Dobrien 4 years, 3 months ago
          Some troll is down voting your sensible comments +1 from me.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ Commander 4 years, 3 months ago
            That's ok. Means i struck a nerve. Sad that this individual is reticent to engage. It is possible that a new potential member is doing such. The "scoreboard" here is what it is and I wonder if a feature could be initiated where a vote, up or down, required posting. A qualifier of honest input.

            Anonymity is the scourge of our present state of affairs globally.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Katrina41 4 years, 3 months ago
            I just got my first thumb down. I don't mind if the member who gave it would post his/her reason. If I am mistaken I want to know.

            Commander 1, I see what you are saying about China. I try to read/listen to a varied bunch of information sources (a few are not worth the effort). I make up my own mind according to facts, which in many cases are nearly non-existant. I believe the "war" with China is mostly economic at this point, but with the covid19-China virus we may be stepping up a bit.

            Thanks for replying and I will work on a less "tasmanian devil" attitude.๐Ÿ˜Š
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Katrina41 4 years, 3 months ago
    Am I the only one out there who believes we are at war (undeclared) with China? I charge the media with complicity in the deliberate mis-direction of vital information. I charge the medical community in general, with very few exceptions, as being complicite in the drive to discredit any doctor or nurse or healthcare professional who dares disagree about Covid19 (China) treatment. I charge politicians of all stripes with aiding and abetting those forces behind the entire Covid19 (China) attack.

    This country is teetering on the verge of internal collapse because no one dares face cancellation by a ruthless foe who cares nothing about law, freedom, responsibility, life. If one is not for life, then it follows that one must be for death. When November's elections are done, we will know where these citizens stand. Will they choose life or will they choose death? I choose life on MY terms, not someone else's choice.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Commander 4 years, 3 months ago
      We are not at war with China. We are being led to a perception of this. I refuse the perception even if hostilities break out. This is a form of psychopathic manipulation by a few, of a few, to create conflict...separation. If I don't drink the "koolaid" I have the ability to choose.

      Think of all the upset folks regardless their social or political affiliations. They'd not be upset or concerned if they did not care. The one thing at stake between all of us is the oppression against leading reasonable equitable lives.

      These thoughts are how I got past being Yosemity Sam Hoppin F'n Mad!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 4 years, 3 months ago
    From the start it did not seem this was an accident, but deep state madness on a global scale, a push for one world government. The more you look into where Fauci's NIAID money went and where he was, the CDC grant 2019 for the same lab, to learn how the virus is made, and "track spread pattern", the lying WHO, and the inder investigation NIH, just too many common thr4eads to that lab outside Wuhan. Fauci inisisting we not shut the borders, when he had to know what was in that lab.China's desire to take over Italy's fashion industry, and the country in general. Now FAuci is in tight with Biden, Obama and Tom Hanks? We have been had, it was a PLandemic. Now, the mask may be what is actually cuusing the spread, as improper use of or or false sense of security for the faulty masks may be actually spreading the disease. Large amounts of research show they leak the virus, we suck it in, it goes to the lungs, yet our ignorant governors say protect the other person- wearing an equally faulty mask. We are not aare brothers keepers, if someone wants to be safe, get mask with oxygen, and stop demanding I ware your faulty masks.As to vaccines, the swine flu vaccine cause dmy brain to swell, no pleasant. Another fieind became paralyzed for months, with even longer to recover.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by dansail 4 years, 3 months ago
    So, my understanding is that Stefan Molyneaux is described as a white supremacist. He's also described as a bigtime conspiracy theorist. Is this true? Does this taint his credibility?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 3 months ago
      Consider the source of the descriptions. Do you believe in the credibility of the accusers who make the claims? Have you researched their claims? Do they have any valid evidence or are they unsupportable opinions designed to sully his reputation? Does Molyneaux support his statements with evidence and does he make rational arguments based on facts?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by dansail 4 years, 3 months ago
        The source is WIkipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_..., which is supposed to undergo peer review.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 3 months ago
          Who decides which so-called peers' opinions are published?
          Unfortunately, imo, Wikipedia is biased and suppresses anything that is in any way controversial. For example, they support global warming and call those who disagree "deniers" in spite of the evidence. It is censorship, not peer review. It is not a trustworthy source of information in some cases, imo, and that includes their character assassination of Molyneaux. Wikipedia presents information in a way that is designed to bias the reader. They do not adequately vet the sources they use for biased reporting, and I conclude that is deliberate.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 4 years, 3 months ago
          Yeah...with all respect, that's not a valid source, unfortunately. Like I said - I've been listening to Stefan for a long time. I'm very anti-racist and I'm not at all convinced he's a white supremacist. I don't know what's in his head, granted.

          I do see him as a guy who really values children and really wants all good people to be well. I've learned some things via his podcast and have adopted some in my life. The biggest being the non-aggression principle and peaceful parenting.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 4 years, 3 months ago
      I have been listening to him for a long time. I do not like when he talks about studies mentioning race vs. IQ. He covers it yet adds, "I don't think we should make generalizations." Honestly, I think he's just making a mistake, or it's a chimp-fisted attempt and notoriety.

      He does not seem like a white supremacist to me. He does seem like somebody with a very sharp understanding of collectivism vs. Objectivism, etc.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo