As Per My Early COVID Studies
I dove into studying this virus before it hit America. In that research I found a whitepaper from Wuhan about attempting to mesh a coronavirus with HIV to see what happens...and how much deadlier it could make it. That research is mentioned in this video. As is the relevance of hydroxychloroquine. This video will disappear very soon. I hope the guest interviewee doesn't.
SOURCE URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HP7wmfqGHc
๐
Anonymity is the scourge of our present state of affairs globally.
Commander 1, I see what you are saying about China. I try to read/listen to a varied bunch of information sources (a few are not worth the effort). I make up my own mind according to facts, which in many cases are nearly non-existant. I believe the "war" with China is mostly economic at this point, but with the covid19-China virus we may be stepping up a bit.
Thanks for replying and I will work on a less "tasmanian devil" attitude.๐
This country is teetering on the verge of internal collapse because no one dares face cancellation by a ruthless foe who cares nothing about law, freedom, responsibility, life. If one is not for life, then it follows that one must be for death. When November's elections are done, we will know where these citizens stand. Will they choose life or will they choose death? I choose life on MY terms, not someone else's choice.
Think of all the upset folks regardless their social or political affiliations. They'd not be upset or concerned if they did not care. The one thing at stake between all of us is the oppression against leading reasonable equitable lives.
These thoughts are how I got past being Yosemity Sam Hoppin F'n Mad!
Unfortunately, imo, Wikipedia is biased and suppresses anything that is in any way controversial. For example, they support global warming and call those who disagree "deniers" in spite of the evidence. It is censorship, not peer review. It is not a trustworthy source of information in some cases, imo, and that includes their character assassination of Molyneaux. Wikipedia presents information in a way that is designed to bias the reader. They do not adequately vet the sources they use for biased reporting, and I conclude that is deliberate.
I do see him as a guy who really values children and really wants all good people to be well. I've learned some things via his podcast and have adopted some in my life. The biggest being the non-aggression principle and peaceful parenting.
He does not seem like a white supremacist to me. He does seem like somebody with a very sharp understanding of collectivism vs. Objectivism, etc.