2 special posts for 1 person. One is by a person who is shadow banned. Therefore, We need to have a community discussion on shadow/permanate Banning.
2
"I told Ewe to go to a place he and the “Objectivistists” don’t believe exists."
Posted by Dobrien 39 minutes ago to Philosophy
0 comments | Share | Best of... | Save | Flag
"I have been Shadow banned since. What penalty exists for this so called infraction should exist for this. What [] is reQuired to get reinstated. I have 35661 pts and have been a regular contributor both in discussions and posts. ThanQ for your comments and replies.
Even the offended EWE could say what retribution he requires. A snowflake melts in the heat."
Do we as a community, a Gulch, want Dan/Dobrien reinstated?
"I told Ewe to go to a place he and the “Objectivistists” don’t believe exists."
Posted by Dobrien 39 minutes ago to Philosophy
0 comments | Share | Best of... | Save | Flag
"I have been Shadow banned since. What penalty exists for this so called infraction should exist for this. What [] is reQuired to get reinstated. I have 35661 pts and have been a regular contributor both in discussions and posts. ThanQ for your comments and replies.
Even the offended EWE could say what retribution he requires. A snowflake melts in the heat."
Do we as a community, a Gulch, want Dan/Dobrien reinstated?
...as if it really makes a difference...
I guess that's the "Real Go to Hell" in 2020
Must be a Post Modernist...
Behavior does and I am trying to have a discussion on where should we draw the line...demeaning someone, calling them stupid, swearing or telling them where to go?
I don't think telling someone where to go crosses that line...It's not demeaning, it's just another way of saying...go away you bother me, kind of funny if you think about it.
Yes, we want civil discourse but we all should know when to quit when our message isn't getting across...sometimes it's the messenger or the message and sometimes it's the respondent,
I am not asking for an immediate response from you, I am just asking all of us to think about that.
We welcome free expression, so where should we reasonably draw the line.
Still no comments by admin, someone else needed for this conversation.
I would ask all, to send admin a note then share your thoughts on this subject and support or not, a reprieve or commutation of Dan/ Dobrien's acceptance back into the Gulch.
I think John Galt would be in support of Dan seeing that he is a valued Creator.
The latter of which we thankfully have never seen here.
Sometimes things need to get personal but how personal is the question.
Let's have a discussion on that point and also, how long should someone be banned for the titled offense.
Let ya know if that's possible.
It went!...asked them to chime in on this discussion as well.
I am going to change the heading to insure that it does...we need everyone's participation.
Do you think he ment a “fictional” place like hell.
If I could I would flag his comment like he did to me.