The Second-hand Science of Electro-Magnetic Pulse EMP
Posted by Doug_Huffman 4 years, 5 months ago to Science
Reading Galt’s Gulch On-line archives, I noticed the EMP Swamp Creature being raised as a boogerman. Here’s a book, short and sweet. Maybe I’ll go find Glasstone on EMP.
https://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/0...
Foreword
Scholars like Garet Garrett, John T. Flynn, and Murray Rothbard have pointed out that a main way the State adds to its power and tyrannizes over the people is to whip up alleged threats from a foreign power. Given the threat, defenders of the State say, don’t we need to take countermeasures, however high the cost? Those of us who grew up in the ‘50s and ’60s remember vividly the “drop drills” that prepared schoolchildren for an impending nuclear attack.
The government neglected to tell us that America was far better armed than the Soviets. The “threat” was concocted to justify a militarist policy and massive government spending.
In this careful study, David Hathaway has given us a microstudy of the Orwellian State’s technique to add to its power.
On July 8, 1962, an atomic warhead was detonated in the Pacific. One purpose of the blast was to study the impact, if any, of ElectroMagnetic Pulse (EMP) effects. One incident is alleged to show such effects. Based on this incident, the government concluded that hostile powers could use EMPs to disable the electronic infrastructure of our country.
Even after the Cold War ended, the government has continued to tout the threat posed by EMPs. Hathaway comments: “The alleged incident happened on the island of Oahu which is made up of the City and County of Honolulu. This incident has developed a cult following within the EMP science community. The incident allegedly involved blown fuses in a small number (less than 1%) of street light strings. It has been trotted out for decades as the single definitive proof of EMP effects on power grid and long-wire infrastructure.”
Hathaway isn’t convinced. He presents a painstaking discussion of the incident, subsequent investigations, and the science behind EMP effects. He writes clearly about complicated science, and his conclusion is backed by abundant evidence: “EMP is a ridiculous notion; one that we are supposed to give up our money, our common sense, and our freedom to validate.
From the state’s perspective, there is always some area of life where people haven’t yet developed the proper level of panic to make them tolerate the forced filling of state coffers in relation to that area. There is always something new to fear that the public can’t quite grasp without the government to ratchet up its fears.”
David Hathaway deserves our gratitude for his excellent and timely account of a little-known propaganda campaign by the State.
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. Chairman and Founder of Mises Institute
Auburn, Alabama December 15, 2017
https://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/0...
Foreword
Scholars like Garet Garrett, John T. Flynn, and Murray Rothbard have pointed out that a main way the State adds to its power and tyrannizes over the people is to whip up alleged threats from a foreign power. Given the threat, defenders of the State say, don’t we need to take countermeasures, however high the cost? Those of us who grew up in the ‘50s and ’60s remember vividly the “drop drills” that prepared schoolchildren for an impending nuclear attack.
The government neglected to tell us that America was far better armed than the Soviets. The “threat” was concocted to justify a militarist policy and massive government spending.
In this careful study, David Hathaway has given us a microstudy of the Orwellian State’s technique to add to its power.
On July 8, 1962, an atomic warhead was detonated in the Pacific. One purpose of the blast was to study the impact, if any, of ElectroMagnetic Pulse (EMP) effects. One incident is alleged to show such effects. Based on this incident, the government concluded that hostile powers could use EMPs to disable the electronic infrastructure of our country.
Even after the Cold War ended, the government has continued to tout the threat posed by EMPs. Hathaway comments: “The alleged incident happened on the island of Oahu which is made up of the City and County of Honolulu. This incident has developed a cult following within the EMP science community. The incident allegedly involved blown fuses in a small number (less than 1%) of street light strings. It has been trotted out for decades as the single definitive proof of EMP effects on power grid and long-wire infrastructure.”
Hathaway isn’t convinced. He presents a painstaking discussion of the incident, subsequent investigations, and the science behind EMP effects. He writes clearly about complicated science, and his conclusion is backed by abundant evidence: “EMP is a ridiculous notion; one that we are supposed to give up our money, our common sense, and our freedom to validate.
From the state’s perspective, there is always some area of life where people haven’t yet developed the proper level of panic to make them tolerate the forced filling of state coffers in relation to that area. There is always something new to fear that the public can’t quite grasp without the government to ratchet up its fears.”
David Hathaway deserves our gratitude for his excellent and timely account of a little-known propaganda campaign by the State.
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. Chairman and Founder of Mises Institute
Auburn, Alabama December 15, 2017
A friend of mine coordinated 5 FBI investigatory cells involved in potential "terroristic" events around 10 years past. EMP was never an issue. Most of the investigatory effort involved hazmat, trucks and trains.
Otherwise, I made mixed hazardous chemical radioactive waste, talk about a sheboondoggle! Try disposing of that! The process fluid went through a heavily shielded gamma detector so I could watch counts rise and dump before it became ‘radioactive’. We could see the Sun position in the sky in the gamma counts.
However, making a strong EM field does work. It can destroy electrical devices. It can even stop electronically controlled engines. If you don't think so, test your cell phone to Mil-Std-461G RS105.
You can construct such a wave with a Marks device and parabolic reflector.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marx_ge...
Focused with a parabolic reflector, electric fields of 10^5 - 10^6 of V/m are possible, and they will destroy electronics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5M6Y...
This guy is a fantastic real engineer, who dispels myths all over. He is hilarious as well.
Here is another one, with a trivial device killing cell phones.
We have Tesla lighting lights wirelessly. So we know the field travels.
We have PLENTY of small tests proving this, and the protective nature of a faraday cage.
Now... How damaging? Not sure. The real challenge is "IF" they cause an overload that blows a BUNCH of transformers.
Because we only have so many of them, they are ALL made in China (from what I understand). And our powergrid has NEVER been taken completely offline.
I don't know that they KNOW how to bring it back up!
I believe it may be a threat. But I will try to read the book. Inducing a current in a wire is a "thing" and an EMP pulse would do that. Not sure about distance/effectiveness...
It would be nice if we knew what happened in Japan. Yeah, those hit the ground... But were any airplanes electronics taken out?
Yes, a Faraday cage will help shield, but cell phones, wifi devices and lots of other things have antennas, and are not shielded.
Where are people getting the idea that this doesn't work? A radio fundamentally worked by inducing a voltage in an antenna. A bigger field, a bigger voltage. This isn't complicated.
I was challenging the AUTHORS idea that it will NOT (ie, I am confident it will generate a pulse, etc)
In HS, Santa Clara HS ‘66, I built a 2 kW Tesla coil and was required to build it’s room size Faraday Cage with interlocked door. Tubes were 750 TL and the coil was 6 feet long. I don’t recall the ratio.
I am CHALLENGING that it WONT induce a current...
Hence we learned about Faraday cages which showed that the current runs on the OUTSIDE of the conductor. But it IS INDUCED.
And if a Moving EM Field induces a current, then EM Pulses exist. The question becomes how damaging could they be?
A long time ago and far far away, I was adding reactivity to an unfluxed untested reactor core. I had a very sensitive instrument suite inside an imperfect Faraday cage of 2” thick HY-80 steel alloy mostly under water. I exercised my authority to command the local vessels and airfield shutdown their radars which electromagnetic pulses were interfering with my very precise indication.
Microprocessors.
How about saying some physics sounding words.
Here are a nice explanation and demonstration for skeptics:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5M6Y...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZnzp...
I don't know why you are getting snippy with me about "smoke microprocessors". We all know electricity works on smoke, because when the smoke come out of the wires, it stops working.
I'd rather stick to electrical engineering sounding words. Square chickens aren't real.
How many conducting loops are there in a conducting sheet, as a Faraday Cage surface? It is not quite infinite.
Solid state electronics work on various 3.3, 5, 12 and 15v. Tubes work on ~100V.
I wonder if any other tests have been done to test the effects of EMP over a 20km radius area.
I would hope that such a test would be kept behind a security wall so that NK or Iran would not be able to learn from this.
We may never know, because while there are legitimate reasons to classify such research, there could also be the natural tendency of Bureaucracy to grow.
If it was easy then everyone might do it.