Hope he gets far enough down this road that he eliminates the possibility of the next socialist from getting elected, like Dubbya, did for conservatives.
Does anyone know if any president has considered striking all prior executive orders and clearing up the big mud pie that exists there?
The real intent of this ExecOrd is found in this phrase: "The order also bans using perfectly legal arbitration agreements," which makes this a sop to the trial lawyers.
Nothing like a little "fair play and brother-love" from ol' Potus... Of course, the "2" of the "one-two" punch is that as more and more comes under control of the dotgov, fewer and fewer businesses will be able to do business, and either come under the control of the dotgov or be forced out...
...and Stalin nods warmly in approval of this scheme...
Thank You for calling it what it is::: fascism. the central direction of private enterprise *plus* govt.
39 years ago, when I hired on at k25 in oak ridge, davis-bacon was the egregious law which kept us from doing anything over $2,000 in value which might be done by a subcontractor -- like hanging a high-speed overhead door on the fire station -- without jumping through hoops with lawyers and piles of paper to prove that we (as the prime contractor) could do it as well as they could. this new EO makes it MORE costly and litigious. -- j
Hello johnpe1, Sad that more Americans don't see it for what it is. I understand from my nieces and nephews that history, social studies, and civics are not taught in the way they once were. The responsibility lies with the same statist, villains from on high... Regards, O.A.
There is, for me at least, a good news side to these types of escalations. In my view, a government "contractor" is just another tax consumer feeding at the trough. If fascism is defined as the systemic collusion between business owners and politicians, then every government contractor is a fascist in fact. The more onerous and risky such tax consumption becomes the less appealing will it be. More and more of us will in this way come to understand the folly of "working" with and for sociopaths.
Hello Helidrvr, Many of my customers are manufacturers that have worked for the government in the past and some still do, but this will just add more cost to the production and gouge the taxpayers unnecessarily.. Too many hoops to jump through and lawyers to protect yourself from the leviathan. This is why our Arms (planes, tanks, etc.) cost so much. Now more honest suppliers will just opt out. Respectfully, O.A.
P.S. One more note: Fascism will in many cases present itself without collusion. All it takes is the government control and mandates. Many businesses will merely comply because of necessity and pressure. They will not do it of their own initiative.
All excellent points of fact. My admittedly somewhat unforgiving comments are ultimately founded in the conviction that leviathan's collapse is inevitable. This is not a matter of "if" but of "when". Since it's inevitable, anything that will hasten the process is "good" in my book. The sooner the better, don't you agree?
If we cannot right the ship, I prefer to rip the bandage off as opposed to a slow nagging pain! At this point the collapse does seem more plausible. All the sooner we can get back to building a proper foundation, one way or another.
So you are saying that if the Federal Government opened its own manufacturing facilities and stopped hiring civilians who compete against each other to offer the lowest price, it would somehow magically reduce the cost of military equipment? Please show me some shred of evidence that this would be even remotely true.
Not sure whom you are addressing this to, but for my part I agree that the cost of government purchases would increase dramatically, thereby hastening its inevitable collapse.
Hello LibertasAutLetum, I am not sure what you are suggesting. I have said no such thing. I routinely do government work and I have never seen a government run enterprise that can compete with a private one. I believe you have misread something or I have not made my self clear. Perhaps you meant to address this comment to another party and replied in the wrong place? Respectfully, O.A.
Ignoring higher govt. cost? I LOVE higher govt. costs. The more expensive to maintain that leviathan becomes the sooner it will have to start shrinking. Private contractors which work for government are exactly the tax consumers I meant to describe. And yes, I agree it is indeed disgusting. LOL
I was referring to truly private contractors who do not work for Govt. They can compete with union contractors. And, no, under statist rule as we are with Obama, higher costs will not lead to cost control.
You're absolutely correct. But they may hasten the collapse.
I'm one of those private entrepreneurs myself. Since I depend on govt. for nothing now, I'm not too worried about surviving with less of it at some point in the future.
I think you are mistaken at best, willfully ignorant at worst. I work for a government contractor. The projects we work on will be done and get paid for regardless of who works on them so wouldn't you rather it be a civilian and not a government employee? We get awarded our contracts because we compete, in a free market, against other civilian companies by offering the best service at the lowest price. (Capitalism anyone?) How dare you suggest that I am a fascist "feeding at the trough"? Do you honestly believe that if the Federal government performed these tasks behind closed doors, writing their own checks to themselves, and NOT allowing a highly competitive market decide the cost that it would indeed reduce the tax consumption you are talking about?
Shakespeare said: "Brevity is the soul of wit!"
Sometimes I wish I was wrong more often.
Regards,
O.A.
Does anyone know if any president has considered striking all prior executive orders and clearing up the big mud pie that exists there?
Indeed! It would be a day for a happy dance!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFNLbAs3K...
Respectfully,
O.A.
I've been the target of the NLRB under similar fraudulent allegations and it's not fun, even without this order.
Justice between two entities would be called a fair trade. I doubt that a fair trade is possible if one of the entities is the federal government.
...and Stalin nods warmly in approval of this scheme...
central direction of private enterprise *plus* govt.
39 years ago, when I hired on at k25 in oak ridge,
davis-bacon was the egregious law which kept us
from doing anything over $2,000 in value which might
be done by a subcontractor -- like hanging a high-speed
overhead door on the fire station -- without jumping through
hoops with lawyers and piles of paper to prove that we
(as the prime contractor) could do it as well as they could.
this new EO makes it MORE costly and litigious. -- j
Sad that more Americans don't see it for what it is. I understand from my nieces and nephews that history, social studies, and civics are not taught in the way they once were. The responsibility lies with the same statist, villains from on high...
Regards,
O.A.
Many of my customers are manufacturers that have worked for the government in the past and some still do, but this will just add more cost to the production and gouge the taxpayers unnecessarily.. Too many hoops to jump through and lawyers to protect yourself from the leviathan. This is why our Arms (planes, tanks, etc.) cost so much. Now more honest suppliers will just opt out.
Respectfully,
O.A.
P.S. One more note: Fascism will in many cases present itself without collusion. All it takes is the government control and mandates. Many businesses will merely comply because of necessity and pressure. They will not do it of their own initiative.
Please show me some shred of evidence that this would be even remotely true.
I am not sure what you are suggesting. I have said no such thing. I routinely do government work and I have never seen a government run enterprise that can compete with a private one. I believe you have misread something or I have not made my self clear. Perhaps you meant to address this comment to another party and replied in the wrong place?
Respectfully,
O.A.
I'm one of those private entrepreneurs myself. Since I depend on govt. for nothing now, I'm not too worried about surviving with less of it at some point in the future.
I work for a government contractor.
The projects we work on will be done and get paid for regardless of who works on them so wouldn't you rather it be a civilian and not a government employee?
We get awarded our contracts because we compete, in a free market, against other civilian companies by offering the best service at the lowest price. (Capitalism anyone?)
How dare you suggest that I am a fascist "feeding at the trough"?
Do you honestly believe that if the Federal government performed these tasks behind closed doors, writing their own checks to themselves, and NOT allowing a highly competitive market decide the cost that it would indeed reduce the tax consumption you are talking about?