Public Education is evil because...
Posted by j_IR1776wg 11 years, 2 months ago to Education
I'll start.
Public Education is evil because it assumes that parents are too stupid or too lazy to educate their children and, therefore, the State must compel them to do so.
Your thoughts?
Public Education is evil because it assumes that parents are too stupid or too lazy to educate their children and, therefore, the State must compel them to do so.
Your thoughts?
I am grateful for my public education with respect to fundamental reading, writing, math, geometry, physics, chemistry, etc.
That said, when I demanded an explanation of why phosphorus defied the octet rule in AP chemistry, I was sent to the principal's office.
I had the fortune to be in TAG/GT programs from an early age, and was granted a degree of freedom to use my sponge (a.k.a. brain) on topics of interest.
While I cannot deny that public education is beyond the scope of a government's functions, I cringe to think of what life might have been like for me without it.
You would have your AP classes in a free system.
Plus with the world wide web that we have nowadays you can find anything you need to teach/learn in school. I hope someone comes up with private schooling online courses. Also..schools are getting more dangerous...many many reasons to home school.
So many issues boil down to urban vs. rural. My county (Howard) is close to Baltimore. It has excellent public schools for the most part. My position on the amount of money I'd be prepared to give to education would be completely reversed if I lived within Baltimore. I do not see that as a contradiction whether you opt to blast me for it or not.
This is a new era. Your points are valid today. I fully agree that "private schooling online courses" are a worthwhile endeavor.
Why would you stoop to labeling me socialist? Are you the queen of McCarthyism in the Gulch?
I'm fairly certain that I'm not the "only" one that notices extremely broad generalizations or extremely narrow differentiations.
I must admit, you seem like you would be an excellent educator. You wouldn't be my favorite teacher at first, but over the long run, I'd eventually appreciate the challenges you'd present me with.
My county draws folks who value a good education, and as such, educated folks. I benefit in many ways from having great public schools in my county.
"Happiness is not to be achieved at the command of emotional whims. Happiness is not the satisfaction of whatever irrational wishes you might blindly attempt to indulge. Happiness is a state of non-contradictory joy—a joy without penalty or guilt, a joy that does not clash with any of your values and does not work for your own destruction, not the joy of escaping from your mind, but of using your mind’s fullest power, not the joy of faking reality, but of achieving values that are real, not the joy of a drunkard, but of a producer. Happiness is possible only to a rational man, the man who desires nothing but rational goals, seeks nothing but rational values and finds his joy in nothing but rational actions." Galt's Speech
On point 1: Yes, most of us do in some form or other. I find it to be in my rational self interest for the time being.
On point 3: There's no need to throw the book at me. What are you trying to say, exactly?
Point 2. manner in which I pay for it divided by my contribution does not equal happiness but something else. your happiness is irrelevant somehow to your contribution. Contribution is a freely given. Therefore contribution is tied to happiness. In this last statement you are making future decisions. that is not consistent with the comment before, and so new information.
It began with the comments: "So you think, and trust, that the gov's roll is to educate children? And to feed them too for that matter?"
I said no such things.
My original points were:
1. This is so hardcore (a difficult issue)
2. I am grateful for my public education
3. I cannot deny that public education is beyond the scope of a [federal] government's functions - my error was leaving out the word "federal"
The later point:
4. As beneficiaries of public education, we are perfectly happy to pay 60% of our $6K in property taxes to the education of children in our county. Admittedly, I would be much more happy to do it voluntarily. - again my error was failing to distinguish my county from the federal government.
I botched my attempt to point out that it is not a contradiction to be happy to pay county property taxes for public education within my county but not happy about the involvement of the federal government in education. I say "botched" because I again left out the distinction between federal and county, and further introduced the idea that I derived some satisfaction from paying county property tax as a "time insensitive trade of value for value with respect to my own public education" - clearly irrelevant rationalization that left a bit of blood in the water - maybe that was the beginning of the feeding frenzy.
The point I failed to make is:
5. I am proud to live in a county that values education as I do, and choose to remain in this county partly because of its great public schools. Yes, by living in this county, I am forced to pay higher property taxes to support those schools. Just because I am forced to do so does not mean that I do not choose to do so or that I cannot be happy about that choice. I could move out of the county if I wasn't happy with it.
My contribution is freely given, I am happy about it, and I am proud to live in a county that values education as I do. Is there anything wrong with this? Is it articulated clearly enough this time?
Public water, sewer, garbage collection and recycling could be privatized much more quickly if we resold the infrastructure.
Aren't we talking about the tax problem?
Being blasted with false accusations right out of the gate is definitely insulting. That's not to say I don't need it or that it's not good for me. I have little to no experience in public debate.
Admitting to "backpedaling and rationalization" stings, but it's not nearly as damaging as denial and/or evasion.
I hadn't really visualized an industrialized community with no public schools, no public water, no public sewer, no public garbage disposal, no public roads, no public traffic signs, no public stoplights, no public snow removal, no public parks, libraries, museums, fire departments etc. In essence, however, taxpayer funding for all of these things needs to go. How fast does it have to happen? How long will chaos reign before capitalism works its magic and we regain the benefits of industrialization?
I think the good middle ground for you and wonky rests on scholarships from private business. Privatize the schools, and those who can't afford the education can apply for those. I for one and I think communities in general value an educated child, whether we have kids our not. I know I'd donate a few bucks to a charity whose supplying scholarships if they give them out to the right schools. As long as no one is being forced, which I'm sure we all agree on, then we will have a moral educational system. No force to go to school no force to pay for school. Deal?
.
others education, it is no problem. It
is maddening, when he wants to
spend my money!
I don't want to spend your money, and I certainly don't think public education is a federal issue.
The federal government certainly has MADE it their issue.
In general, I find that the dialog is more stimulating, the potential for self improvement is greater, and communication is easier.
take 2: I prefer to be around people who have a panda's understanding of good grammar, [NO, THIS IS NOT A SLAM AT YOUR GRAMMAR SKILLS. OR ANYONE ELSE'S] but I don't get it very often. sigh.
"I prefer to be around people with at least a basic education" We all do! It's having to pay for that basic education with a gun to our temples that is galling..
community cottage.
Interesting ideas or
converations were verboten:-)
I always jump on the "I have no choice...." statements, because there's always a choice. It might be Liberty or Death, but it's a choice!
hey, you live in Colorado? where bouts? I'm a Springs girl-well was before the galting
I USED to live just up the road from there, south of Parker. I am now serving a 2-year "no home loan" sentence in beautiful Reunion, 20 minutes NW of the airport, where the water is so hard you have to cut it with scissors to get a glassful and they're fracking right down the road.
I have friends in Colorado Springs - I always thought it would be a comfortable place to live, right ON a primary nuclear target, rather than in Boulder, where you'd have to deal with fallout [the nuclear kind, as well as what your hair does].
hierarchy of values
2 Members & 8 Lurkers Online Now Including ...
$ khalling (11,399)
$ LetsShrug (11,326)
I withdraw my accusation.
hahahahahahahha ha ha
you are having a discussion in the best possible forum. no monarchy here. but that was funny
So, it is true that if the government did not give people tax breaks, they might have fewer children. I guess in a few generations we would be a nation of rich Catholics, like Kennedy's Camelot or something...
At the heart of public education, however, is indoctrination. Let’s not forget this. It is most evident in the fact that school children are forced, day after day for 12 years, to begin their day parroting “The Pledge of Allegiance.” They are never told why, nor where this pledge came from. They grow up thinking that saying the Pledge is some kind of holy ritual of patriotism, when, in fact, it is not.
If you asked your garden-variety American “conservative” if he would welcome his children reciting something that was initiated by a proclaimed socialist, you’d receive an indignant response. And yet, that is exactly what the Pledge is. It has nothing to do with the Founding Fathers nor with the founding of this nation and its ideals; it was an invention of the 1890s and was instilled in our schools primarily as a tool of indoctrination. At the beginning, the salute was made with the right arm uplifted. That was changed to a reverent hand-over-the-heart when the Nazis co-oped the salute.
When I became aware of the origins of the Pledge in the late 1980s, I lost all respect for this ritual and became an advocate against its use. It is only one form of indoctrination that children receive in school, but it is the most obvious. American history, as it is taught in the schools, is another form of indoctrination. We are taught that the “great” presidents are those who pushed their powers beyond the Constitution, who involved their countrymen in war, and who inserted government into the economic and personal transactions of so-called “free” individuals. Children grow up taking it for granted that there is no area of life in which government doesn’t have authority. They are taught that there is no problem that government can’t solve.
The purpose of public education is not to teach children how to think independently, but to teach them how to be docile, obedient, and unquestioning citizens of the State. How evil is that?
Here is a timely link to the Future of Freedom Foundation, and the latest blog of its founder, Jacob Hornsberger: http://fff.org/2013/09/12/the-most-borin...
Don’t question the underlying evil of an institution just became some people manage to derive some good from it.
it's un-American
great post, flora. looking forward to more
"I begin with my conclusion: The 'public' school system is the most immoral and corrupt institution in the United States of America today, and it should be abolished. It should be abolished for the same reason that chattel slavery was ended in the 19th century: Although different in purpose and in magnitude of harm to its victims, public education, like slavery, is a form of involuntary servitude. The primary difference is that public schools force children to serve the interests of the state rather than those of an individual master."
1. Education is a service. No one has a "right" to a "service," except for three specific services. These services all have to do with the management of physical force and the protection of such rights as a person does have. And they are:
Police
Military
Courts of law
Education is NOT one of them.
2. Government education becomes indoctrination. Any government is at moral hazard, and subject to a temptation to promote values--there's that word again--that the government knows is most condusive to its own power and its ability to do special favors for people.
I will leave you with Ms. Rand's ideas on education.
“The only purpose of education is to teach a student how to live his life-by developing his mind and equipping him to deal with reality. The training he needs is theoretical, i.e., conceptual. He has to be taught to think, to understand, to integrate, to prove. He has to be taught the essentials of the knowledge discovered in the past-and he has to be equipped to acquire further knowledge by his own effort.”
Ayn Rand, author of The Fountainhead, Anthem, & Atlas Shrugged
The psycho-epistemological meaning and implementation of these three are: don't integrate--don't evaluate--give up."
Learning on my own has worked well for me.
there were no details so I racked it up to auto spellcheck. More likely you meant chloroformist or choral...director or
are you back from a product run?
http://www.cmca12.com/
The main adviser to the HS and the economics teacher is a former Reagan economic adviser. He also runs the pikes Peak Economics club:
https://pikespeakeconomicsclub.com/CMS/P...
in plain sight j, in plain sight
Could you tell me how you replied to "this thread" ? I've noticed that we run of space when we post many times on a subject.
Consider encouraging them to volunteer some time at the schools (if they can). Meet like minded people with common goals. But also, go to an economic club meeting (babies allowed) held in the high school.
Its no longer simply education, its social engineering and indoctrination.
Public education is in a long, long failure mode for many reasons. However, it was begun with all the right intentions. Taxpayers vote to support local schools. They elect the local school board. Local school board elections in the 1830s in Kentucky seem to be first instances of women as property owners being allowed to vote.
Public education is a reflection of the high value that we place on education. By the 1850s Ohio alone had more colleges and universities than all of Europe. The Morrill Land Grant created the agricultural colleges that today we call Michigan State and Pennsylvania State Universities.
One of the prime, core motives for public education was the socialization of immigrants to American values.
Public education, like public roads, and public sewers, and public parks, is not the proper business of government. ...
But, what if I want to build a private community... (See where this is going?) ... The contract says that you will do this or that with your garbage and your dog's poop and that you will mow your lawn and BTW we have a school... Don't move here if you don't like it, but once you buy in, then the whole package is yours.
So, the problem is not really public schools, but (1) who controls them and therefore (2) what they teach.
And I gave Wonky a Thumbs Up. I do not agree with all of it. High school sucked for me, too, but, that said, I learned a lot. I, too, was tracked into the Academically Talented cohort -- but I had to goto summer school get into AP because I was not tracked into that.
Could I have learned more by some other method, some miracle of the free market? Quite likely. And if we had not fought two world wars, we could have been on the Moon by 1950. And a lot of things would be different if they were different.
by definition, a public school is financed by the public [that's the government] which means its curriculum is skewed.
Call them "city schools" if you want - if they're financed with taxes, they are tainted from the very beginning.
"One of the prime, core motives for public education was the socialization of immigrants to American values".
Education in America began primarily to teach religion and practical skills, mostly agriculture since that was America in the 1700's. "Socialization" began with John Dewey's My Pedagogic Creed. written in 1897. I think we all agree that government should be limited to a police force, a military force, and a system of courts.
Public schools in the vicinity of military bases are quite different from public schools in static areas where very few kids come and go. Until I attended a public school far from a military base, I didn't know what a click was, and I took for granted that most would accept me as a newcomer, and likewise, I would accept most newcomers, without much labeling.
"Our society values all the wrong things"- judgement, condemnation, victimization? Are you a member (you did claim ownership/inclusion through use of the word "our")? Do you value the wrong things? Does the society really value ALL the wrong things while you are a member?
How do you ever get to the meat of a point if you're picking apart the fiber. I don't have exact numbers (neither did you) I'm basing this on my own personal observation (WHICH SHOULD BE OBVIOUS). Also, it should be obvious that I'm excluded from the "our" comment...or maybe I should've gone with "most people in our society...", which would have bothered you too.
Have a conversation and take the points that are made and stop nitpicking generalizations when they're intended to be generalizations. Yeeek!
No, can't say that would have bothered me. You putting words in my mouth does bother me.
I do appreciate the correction on the word "click"... It detracts from your point about picking apart the fiber. Clearly we are both capable of having emotional reactions that can cause us to say things better left unsaid.
Reminds me of a scene from the first of the new Star Trek films where Spock gives in and engages in a thrilling fist fight with a fellow student over an insult.
breaking down the fiber compared to getting to meat of something has me confused. Moral fiber (conservative use)vs. breaking down the fiber(progressive use). getting to the meat of something is going to Pi$$ off lucky, etc.
clearly, wonky had an ok time in school. but, I'll bet Wonky was not moved up to even 5th grade and had to drum his fingers all day long, every day while everyone else was working at grade level. yes, wonky you were HARMonized with your fellow classmates. in actuality you were used as an aphid for the others-to pull them UP while you were held back. that is the public school way. it happened to me and both of my parents were full time teachers. I was latch key before the term was invented. Why couldn't my mom have taken me to her school every morning? De-segregation. I walked 10 miles uphill both ways as a 3rd grader and sat around other 3rd graders and a teacher tht bored me to death. yes, I almost died. that's when I learned to slllliddddeee. bad habit, that.
College was a different story... I noticed plenty of evildoers there, and yet I still paid good money for it.
still paying?
"College was a different story...I noticed plenty of evildoers there, and yet I still paid good money for it." Another contradiction.
disclaimer: I have no source handy for the following because all my "teacher books" are packed and won't be unpacked until I can do it without crying.
By most measures, "gifted" [read smart] begins at about 135 on the Stanford-Binet. About 2% of the population falls above that 135.
ASIDE: Like any test, the further you get away from the middle, the less accurate the test is. The biggie is the Four Sigma - they take the top 2% of that top 2%, and they do their own testing. I understood the questions, but couldn't answer them!
So, we have the "smart population" being 2% of the total population.
For the population of teenagers who try to or do commit suicide, 50% are smart.
My conclusion? Public education is killing off our best and brightest, and it's not by accident.
It is assumed by most educational institutions for the general public that the smart kids will get along, so we don't have to worry about them - and they do get used as "mini-teachers". Most of the smart kids I taught learned NOTHING academic during High School. One reported to me "It's tough - I can do no work, and get an A, or do 5 hours of work, learn something, and get the same A. Nobody cares but me."
Brilliant conclusion. The schools are crushing Reason one little mind at a time on purpose..
You know why programs for smart kids have a higher-than-average proportion of males? Because boys who are bored with the 784th math worksheet make the paper into an airplane and throw it, and get it trouble, and get tested, yada yada. Bored girl, however, turn the paper over and quietly draw a picture of a house. They hide. grrrr.
So "most" only bothers you some of the time? I'll keep that in mind... not. I've never watched Star Trek. I was more of a Monkees watcher.
I know the movie version Flicka and original Lassie, plus all the Lassie movies. Family Classics with Frazier Thomas
But you have to sing it while you're eating Rice Krispies, or it doesn't work.
Free lunch for ONE example.... what messages does getting a "free" lunch instill into a small mind? (regardless of circumstance). That the school (aka the gov) will make sure all my needs are met. And we wonder why we're looking at the laziest, most demanding, complacent, backwards thinking, stoned generation we've ever seen. Not to mention disgustingly wasteful and unappreciative.
"Jack Sprat would eat no fat , his wife would eat no lean,
So together they licked the platter clean."
It's "and so between the two of them,
they licked the platter clean."
"and so BETWIXT the two of them..."
geez, what's a poor word geek to do?
she had to learn to walk on her own two feet.
bahahaha
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPQVrjnC1...
you know, last newsletter day some Objectivist came in here and tore my house post to shreds, which was kinda the point of the post, but then all the comments and likened himself to the farmer in the dell. he wraps up his big arrogant point by saying the bone stands alone.
what a cheese
and yes, it is "the cheese stands alone".
dictionary?
In NJ, it used to be that the State required 16 years of compulsory education. Not sending your child to school was against the law! I doubt if that has changed.
And it is daycare in particular because as capitalism developed in the 19th century, schooling took kids out of the homes and off the streets so that the parents could work. Also, it reduced the labor force competing for simple jobs.
All in all, public education served many purposes, which is why people vote for it.
In some places, it is organized at the state level but mostly, it is a LOCAL government function and is usually INDEPENDENT of the civic government (mayor, council, police...).
Moreover, the overwhelming success of Catholic schools shows that a demand for cost-effective primary and secondary education does exist. However, never ever ever until just recently was any enterprise motivated to create competitive private schools (except the Catholics, and some other fringe groups). So, you can rant - and we will join you - but the fact is that this is what most people want and are willing to pay for. Public education was not a secret conspiracy by progressives foisted upon us like the Federal Reserve Bank -- unless you think that Miss Crabtree of the Little Rascals was a Bilderberger...
The future may well bring some other modes of education, of course.
"Public education was not a secret conspiracy..."
"The future may well bring some other modes of education, of course."
I did like LS's "private schooling online courses" idea. Not sure how that would work for younger kids. I don't know how important it is for kids to interact with their peers - that could be problematic.
"Public Education was not a conspiracy." I'll tell that to my parents (high school and 5th/6th grade teachers) who were disgusted with curriculum and policy changes in the schools. For them, it was in the last ten years of their teaching. They retired sad about the Dept of Education and the NEA.
"The key to the study was constant contact with a primary parent in those years"
I seem to remember a book written by Senator Daniel Patrick Moynahan (not sure on spelling) in which he showed that children raised in a home by two parents for 18 years, got more education, made more money, formed stable relationships, and committed less crime.
if my mom had been with me 1st -6, well, I wouldn't have gotten away with sliding. lol actually I really didn't. when I was in 4th grade, she'd give the 6th grade math papers to grade. I remember watching Hawaii 5-O while a whole stack of papers were on a TV tray in front of me. I graded them, watched whomever Dan-O booked, and cracked a new Conan Doyle on the couch next to me. no one sent me to high school to do anything, but I made all kinds of mischief with mercury in my mom's classroom. I'm still alive.
"All in all, public education served many purposes, which is why people vote for it."
Did you disagree with AR when she stated that he who initiates physical force is wrong? It applies to governments as well as to individuals. Compullsory Public Education is applied physical force.
And Miss Crabtree IS a Bilderberger. Alex Jones told me so.
I heard in an essay kintergarten compared to military boot camp and rightly so. Modern education is creating slaves for the future just as bootcamp creates soldiers.
They are not educational centers, these schools teach what to think, what to believe, how to perceive the world infront of them, they are machines of mental slavery, making idiots out of the general public.
Its no secret teachers do not choose what to teach, they are only instructed what to teach and how to teach it. They are roman lecters imposing pain of degradation on the great minds of our children on the behalf of Cesars.
If the government had to shut down, I think the school should be one of the first to go.
.
As for Wonky, I'd love to know when and where she went to her wonderful, public schools! As for me, I agree with her, for the most part, if she attended in the 50's and early 60's, like I did. But, she didn't mention daily prayers and the Pledge of Allegiance, which was the norm for me. And, not all got trophies, or passing grades, no matter whether they were earned or not.
Can we not see where this is going? If not, then they are right in that we are stupid! You can write about satan, (refuse to cap the first letter) but not God or Jesus. They can check out any books on witchcraft, astrology, numerology, and satan's bible, but not the Holy Bible! No more Christian songs or Christmas songs, nor any kind of prayers. However, no laws exist to prevent these things, just fears of offending one's civil rights and/or somebody's feelings. It's actually fears of the ACLU, formed in 1928 by Communists! And, we let them get away with it? Yes, because nobody wants to stir up trouble. Well, just keep sticking your heads in the sand and pretend it doesn't involve you. But, rest assured, the day is on the horizon, as your day is coming, and sooner than you think! When that happens, never mind, it will be too late.
Political Correct crap, will destroy our once great, powerful USA. That used to stand for the United States of America.....Thanks to Obama and the Dem Party, (most of them, not all) we are so not united, but a race war, or any type of war they can create.
No, I did not vote for Obama, skin clor had nothing to do with it. It's called experience, of which he had none! Also, I didn't like his voting, or lack thereof, nor his past, which is still a real mystery, with all records sealed! But, I do pray for him daily, as he is the President. I still have a real problem with his remark in his book, "The Audacity of Hope, where on page 261, he said, "Should the winds of change shift, I will stand behind the Muslims." Sorry, but that does disturb me. Furthermore, I do not want to be Europenized, keep that across the pond. It isn't working there either, or anywhere for that matter, so why does he insist on that? Not to mention his stance on Israel, who just might end up saving us, befoe all is said and done. I will not go off on the "phony scandals" with the IRS, NSA, Fast & Furious, HIS RED LINE, that was suddenly not his, but I will share my awful anger on BENGHAZI and how his "Apology Tour," where none of them have become our FRIENDS.
No, America is now so weak our enemies are rejoicing, laughing and our worst enemies are now enboldened and no one fears the mighty power of America. They see us as very weak and by no means a leader. It infuriates me when I recall how we saved most of those Countries in WWI & WWII! Oh, how the mighty has fallen.
The best way to settle the crisses in the Middle East, Russia, Afganistan, Iraq, Pakistan and N. Korea is to send all of his Advisors, Czars and Cabinet Members over to those Countries. I'm sure within or less than 6 months, they would be so screwed up, they would forget what their intentions were! I have not gotten to our OPEN BORDERS either. Are you aware of the 50 gal containers of water, in numerous places across the border? Or with a red button to push for on a large sign written in 3 different languages, to call for help? Or the Korans & Prayer Logs left behind from the Radical Muslims, Hezbolah & Drug Cartels working together, coming to America? Know this, I spent 20 years in upper management, as City MGR., in Car Rentals w/5 Companies, and other businesses. I hired illegal
immigrants, Muslims, (good ones) Blacks and all at the same wages as the whites! I was able to get green cards for most, (this was in the 70's & 80's). They were great, honest, hard working employees. I loved them all and they returned that love & respect a hundred fold. So, don't even think about pointing that accusing finger of
racism to me! But, now days, I believe it should have be legal to enter this Country and no over-staying Visas! 9-11 could have & should have been avoided. I already imagine that today's, horrific shooting at the Navel Shipping Yard in DC, will be another "Work Place Violence," again. Obama cannot say, "terrorist attack." He would be from Ft. Worth, TX. I live in TX. Gov. Perry's push TX. TX is very corrupt with the legal system! I wrote a book, "A Judicial Terror in TX."
I love they way j_IR1776wg & LetsShrug thinks!
But, saddly & unfortunately, I fear we are a minorty.
"I love they way j_IR1776wg & LetsShrug thinks! "
Thank you. I believe we are a vocal and growing minority. We must keep trying to inform our fellow citizens. I just bought your book.
Early on, personal supplies are put in a group box to be shared, with no thought for personal responsibility for those items.
Later, they are taught that parents don't understand students like their peers do, and they should make their own decisions without parents (age 8). A former union member once admitted it, and then complained when they later turned against teachers. When asked if they did not turn them against adults, she replied, "But, I did not think they would turn against us (teachers)."
The NEA published a teachers-only book, "Change Agents Guide" (I have a copy). It taught how to turn around parents' objections to goofy curriculum.
Students rank 25th in the world, and teacher IQs have now dipped to an average mere 110, on par with the mainstream media. Student IQs fall the longer they are in public schools..Yet, they feel it is fine to tell children their parents know nothing, even though parents' IQs are very often higher. Sadly, too many parents are giving up the child rearing responsibility to lesser intelligence, falling for this propaganda.
Turned against capitalism and big business, students are taught they should start out making $100,000, or it is beneath them. This is not how economics works. Teachers tell students they "deserve" to make this - based on what?
Ayers-like Common Core now is schools in most states, and will rewrite history while leading students toward a more Marxist mindset."Rights" are stressed, but few teachers follow it with any mention of "responsibility".
Bogus global warming and pro-Agenda 21 ideas come by high school.
Trust government schools - it would be safer to trust Putin.
To preserve liberty, we must encourage our people to get into the educational systems as teachers, administrators and members of the school boards. I would like to see the Conservative organizations like the Tea Party sponsor scholarships and educational foundations to promote our cause.
Talk radio and political speeches are not enough.
Soon, liberty will be found only in history books.
Load more comments...