Atlantis locales

Posted by $ johnrobert2 9 years, 3 months ago to Culture
106 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

jbrenner and I have been privately discussing Atlantis locales and he suggested I bring a couple to the table for discussion. Based on my research last year, and my decided preference, I offer these two locales for your information:

http://www.privateislandsonline.com/c...

http://www.privateislandsonline.com/c...

One is much larger, more desirable and, unsurprisingly, more expensive. It, however, offers more area for expansion as the community would grow. Both offer freehold status, though autonomy may be a bit harder to negotiate. Methinks commercial (read resort) development might be a possible income source though that would make the property more desirable for appropriation by an inimical entity bent on depredation.

Enough from me. Have at it, y'all.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
    John, what I see in those two examples is small properties with no infrastructure for $30,000 per acre, and they don't include any concessions of sovereignty from the existing government.
    They are both in Fiji, imo, too far from the families of the Americans we would hope to attract to Atlantis.
    Assuming that tourism is your initial primary industry, nearest airport is 102 miles from Vanua Levu. Have you found any info on what is involved in getting to the islands from there?
    Fiji has a history of nationalizing industry and frequent coups. It's 1990 constitution " institutionalises ethnic Fijian domination of the political system."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...
    Fiji has only been democratic since Sept 2014, so there is little evidence that will continue. Per an Aussie government site, Fiji government receives about $120 million in foreign aid in total, 52% from Australia. However, China pledged $167 million in grants and loans on 2007.Chinese companies have also invested in mining industry in Fiji.
    Military aid is received from Australia, the People's Republic of China.
    Army:
    2000 troops, 2/3 stationed in Fiji, 1/3 on UN missions in middle east.
    Navy:
    3 Pacific class patrol boat (Australia, displacement 162 t, length 31,5 m, width 8,1 m, draught 1,8 m, power 2 x 1,050 kW, maximal speed 20 knots (37 km/h), crew 17 man, equipment machine guns 1 x 12,7 mm.
    2 patrol boat (USA, displacement 97 t, crew 11 man, equipment machine guns 1 x 12,7 mm)
    4 Dabur class patrol boat (Israel, displacement 39 t, crew 9 man, equipment 2 x cannon 20 mm, 2 x machine guns 7,62)
    Air wing: disbanded in 1997
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republi...
    Some details of military coups also on that link.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by philosophercat 9 years, 3 months ago
    I lived through the 60's attempt by O's and Lib's to try this. Floating cities to hidden islands they all failed as feasible concepts. You have to be willing to lose everything and see it fail in five years unless you can make it profitable. These islands are too small. I was a professional land use planner and worked on the Big Island of Hawaii on this problem for the largest land owner on the island.
    I have also worked on the tourism problem as the basis of island economies and have a solution which I am just getting ready for a start up. If you guys can put up the 200 million in venture capital money to buy the islands, build the landing fields, docks and harbor, fuel storage stores, housing, medevac, power, water, communications labor supply etc then I can show you that these islands are too small. There is a reason they are vacant of natives. I was on the resort council as a ski area planner at the Urban Land Institute and looked at feasibility studies from all over the world.

    I also was headhunted by Disney on taking charge of their undeveloped lands but had not been in a corp. I can show you much more feasible locations that will produce a profit while paying for all the infrastructure and enable you survive.

    Just for fun read David McCullough's book Champlain's Dream about the French attempt to settle Canada. The Jurassic Park movies aren't a bad reality check either.

    The last piece of land I ran was 55,000 acres. Now I pick apples, cut wood, ski, and write philosophy, but I know how to do it. Have to have learned something in making people happy on remote lands. Hawaii was a good example. Good Luck.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ sjatkins 9 years, 3 months ago
      Actually most of them are not off the drawing boards. An effort outside the 200 mile radius needs to start with a city component or a few at a time and some pretty hardy pioneer types that either don't need continuing new income for a while, have sufficient investment or passive income or who can do their work from anywhere via the internet. It needs a more modes set of early investors and amounts.

      To be economically net positive it needs to be a location eventually for types of enterprises hard to launch or run without strangling levels of regulation elsewhere.

      But very very few new townships become economically viable within a mere five years without something very valuable being created or exploited near at hand. I wouldn't worry much about that for at least 10 years as long as the foundations are being laid and the right people are being attracted.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      Hi 'cat-
      Welcome to the melee. Agree with your points. A very large parcel is necessary to become as self sufficient as possible. Infrastructure can be built on an as needed basis, except a fresh water source. Which is why I look for large islands. Not too many available. Those that are have some population and probably would be unwilling to put up with us. One of the best opportunities I saw was a peninsula on Vanua Levu, Fiji which was offered last year but..... . If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. Thanks for the input and keep watching. You never can tell, something may break loose.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by philosophercat 9 years, 3 months ago
        I worked on a project that was thousands of acres and had failed. Minneapolis Gas reppoed it and I consulted on their problem I have done this for many banks. What I learned was the few early buyers are buying a dream but there are not enough early adaptors to sustain the cash flow and debt structure and to capitalize the infrastructure which makes the dream real. So all the money has to be provided by the founders until it becomes a market driven cash flow. And on remote islands that aint gonna happen. It can be done but not there.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
          Thanks for the dose of reality, Phcat. Dreams must meet reality at the origin.
          What are the most important criteria to use in finding the site, in your opinion?
          Is this a pertinent question:
          What size is the minimum in acres, if it is not an island, but has capability of sea shipping?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
            Excellent question. Several options existed a year ago. I really haven't found too much in recent searches. The Fiji property I found last year seemed to meet all the criteria, except maybe for size (and that was close) and probably the sovereignty issue, although the property was a freehold.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
              Was thinking that locales with some nearby infrastructure would be better investments than Fiji, johnrobert. Last year I think you also found a couple in Panama and NZ that were more promising than anything that Fiji offers. (just imo)
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
                NZ has a problem with immigrants. If you are Aussie, no probs, mate. If you are anything else, better come with a buttload of money, adequate pension, or a listed skill set. They don't want anyone who might wind up on their national medicine rolls needing care.
                Panama has a problem, as most Central and South American countries, with sudden and violent governmental change. Getting caught in the crossfire is not my idea of fun. True, some are more stable than others but the propensity to nationalize anything of value happens all too often. Having lived most of my life close to the southern border, I tend to pay a lot of attention to stuff like that.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
                  I lived in NZ for several years and at that time (2011-2013) small businesses were welcomed if they were reasonably funded. NZ fairly does not want to invite people likely to become dependent. I can't speak to the current VISA requirements, but business taxes are much lower in NZ than in USA. GST is higher, but I prefer tax on consumption over tax on production and only the final consumer pays GST; businesses get immediate reimbursement. NZ also has the advantage of their citizens being welcomed in Australia, and that is a very attractive market for NZ business.
                  Panama's stability is much better than Fiji, there are tax advantages there, and residency requirements are low. I considered moving to Panama seriously about 7 years ago and decided not to do so at that time, but if there had been a Gulch community possible my decision would have been different, I think.
                  Panama also has very significant advantages in transportation, first world internet capabilities and infrastructure, and a low cost work force for construction of Atlantis. I'm not saying it's ideal, but I'd take it over Fiji. We really need to define the parameters for comparison though, or there will be little progress in finding a site for Atlantis.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
    Hi freedom-
    Granted, there are some issues with sovereignty and political instability. However, no matter where you go, there will be issues of these natures to deal with. As to the distance involved, for me, it is one of the plusses. The original Atlantis from AS, made itself, basically, technologically separate. Since we do not have that ability at the present time, the option is to do it geographically. There will be no perfect locale for our Atlantis. The best we can do is take all the criteria and see which one matches the most. I guess I'm not as opposed to being in a faraway place. Hell, I'd even take the trip to Mars, if they would let me.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
      No argument with your statements, John. I posted pertinent info about the area so people aren't ignorant of the facts. I would agree about Mars if it was practical to establish a colony there. When it is, the advantages (low gravity for one) may outweigh the difficulties.
      However, nothing is remote enough on earth to dissuade the US military and the UN busybodies, when there is a local government that wants to crush a secession, which is the only way Atlantis gets true liberty from the nation it settles in.
      Unless you have a Midas with deep pockets and more respect for liberty than need for power/control, It will be more important to have a location that has a more reasonable land cost, better existing facilities and transportation to enable construction at reasonable cost, and shorter travel time for relatives of those who value liberty enough to immigrate to Atlantis. The latter is less important to me than the cost issues, but other producers may wish to maintain stronger ties to home. If recruiting is important to Atlantis, the distance may be a very important factor.
      (Midas didn't build the Gulch by paying $30,000/acre for remote land without infrastructure or transportation. He picked land that was within a few hours by plane, albeit isolated. OTOH, he didn't expect to be there permanently.)
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ sjatkins 9 years, 3 months ago
        We have at least 20 years of near earth space build out to do, including mining near earth asteroids, before it is remotely feasible to set up a colony on Mars. Not to mention the small problem of getting something a lot better than today's rockets to get people and goods there and back. It would be more reasonable to build a space colony or one on the moon long before it is possible to do one on Mars.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by SantomR 9 years, 3 months ago
    I think the idea of an island is rather unrealistic and isolationist. There are many problems associated with maintaining a community in such an environment. Is Atlantis going to be 100% self sustaining? Will the residents be totally independent from the world's banking and finance system and more importantly will they have to rely at all on the world's market place for any goods and services, if so which ones? Having spent 30 years in the submarine force we were able to have nearly and endless source of power (nuclear), and we could make our own water (from seawater) and air (Oxygen Generator). However our ability to remain at sea was limited on how much food we could carry. Additionally our submarine was staffed with a corpsman that could handle minor medical issues but nothing very serious.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      Hi SantomR- Just about every angle has been cussed and discussed on this subject. From whether it should be a remote island; a near island; degree of interaction with outside; whether agricultural based, tech connected or industrially based; energy sources; how big it should be; even the form of government and any restrictions on immigration. Best bet is to read the thread(s), print them if you have to, and see
      if the concept interests you.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 3 months ago
    Finding a location without the ability to defend it will be a herculean task. I've a feeling that accommodation will be needed. Finding land whether island or mainland that is unattractive to local powers, yet attractive to Gulchers -- not easily to be attained, but I don't think impossible.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ sjatkins 9 years, 3 months ago
    To truly develop a space for freedom it only seems possible if it can be set up as a separate country effectively with its own laws. Unless an existing struggling country is at hand that would be suitable this means in my understanding either land not otherwise claimed by any country or outside the 200 miles from existing country limit. A small starter island can be extend using the floating city work done by Japan and China. Another way to go is for a complete seastead approach.

    But a Gulch like retreat with suitable protections against outsiders knowing what it is may be more doable. But its continuing survival and lack of detection cannot be guaranteed.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by gcarl615 9 years, 3 months ago
    I really like that you guys are doing this research. Thank you. Now having said that, may I say a few things? While I like the idea of remote, the more remote the better, is Fiji the best we can do? As a nation they suck. I think autonomy is a major issue and should be unconditional, including the ability to protect ourselves.

    Could our refuge be somehow inexpensive to get to? By boat perhaps. I would like the ability to bring my tools and other supplies I would deem necessary to build a new life. I don't believe our stay in the Gulch will be short nor easy. The better supplied initially the better off we would be, not to mention independent of the corrupt world.

    I know the challenges of this whole idea of a real time Gulch are great and I respect you guys for taking it on I live in the upper Midwest of the US. I have seriously looked at moving to the Redoubt that James Rawles seems to have somewhat established in the upper part of the western states. However, The sheer logistics of packing up and moving to an informal Gulch still within the US borders is daunting at best.

    I wish you guys success with this, please keep us informed
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      Quick question, gcarl. What type of tools are we talking? My take is any tools, other than heavy industrial types, should be hand powered as fuel for electrical generation would be hellishly expensive. At least initially. Allowance can be made for machinery for a master machinist to have a ball plying their trade, as they would be making the pieces necessary for the community to build. Other than that, hand tools would be best. I, myself, would bring all my carpentry tools, including my crosscut and ripping saws, planes, draw knives, chisels, etc.

      As I have iterated earlier, there is no perfect place. I keep searching for someplace that is far enough away from everyone else we wouldn't be disturbed too much but, the world being as it is, every place is claimed by someone. The best we can hope for is being innocuous enough (and prickly enough) no one wants to bother with us, the cost/benefit ratio being too high for the trouble. WOW, all this started by asking what kind of tools. Wonder what would have happened had I asked a REALLY serious question?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ sjatkins 9 years, 3 months ago
        Why? There are small nuclear plants sufficient to power approximately 20,000 homes available now. They are of the buy, bury and forget for 20+ years type and ultra safe. I don't see independent energy as that large a problem.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
          At a cost of $2,500 to $5,000 per KWe, and 5kw/home (more for businesses) your 20,000 homes result in a capital cost of $250 to $500 million.
          (This is from a neophyte, not an expert in power generation, using internet sources.)

          It also becomes a very tempting target for enemies.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by gcarl615 9 years, 3 months ago
        I want to add another thing, if I may. Everything I would want to bring would fit quite nicely in a forty foot shipping container. If you were find a place to a Gulch perhaps if a large enough group of people had similar "needs"( I hate to use that word) a small cargo ship could accomidate them?, That of course would require the Gulch to have a dock and port equipment.. Can you tell I would really like to see this happen? When can we go? HUH, Huh When?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by gcarl615 9 years, 3 months ago
        I have a pretty good collection of non-electric tools for automotive, woodworking,,plumbing , general carpentry as well my new blacksmith tools, including a small forge. Also gardening and lumber jacking. As far as electric and/or gas powered yes I have those too nothing along industrial size, I have the hand tools and skills to go along with them incase of a grid down situation. as far as your comment on energy I agree with the comment below. Another idea might include some solar arrays, and since we will be on an island how about wave/tide powered hydro electric turbines? As far as a really serious question, as I was typing the original post, I thought you would ask about what means of self protection might be appropriate.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 2 months ago
    Okay, folks. Here it is. The Fiji location of which I spoke earlier. This is a humongous piece of property with all kinds of developmental potential. I know some of you are adamantly opposed to Fiji as a location but, for the life of me, I can't find anything better. I've looked at this from all sorts of angles and there is just too much potential here to ignore. Managed lumbering, aquaculture, tourism, agriculture, industrial. There's even a deep water inlet for maritime operations. Freehold status. The biggest bump would getting the Fijian government to allow sovereignty.

    http://exclusiveview.knightfrank.com....
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Terraformer_One 9 years, 2 months ago
    My concept:
    Pick a place to start a business with Gulch members being considered as prefered stockholders.

    Have you heard of 'strata titling'? Apparently it is where all of the units of an apartment building get recorded as private residences. These can subsequently be bought and sold based on the calculations of the owners.

    In Australia we have a self-managed super fund scheme, I think that the best way to describe it to Americans is a 401k controlled by the individual that it affects.


    I would like to create an agricultural business that focuses on 'industrial-scale organic agriculture' each resident (+family - multiple generation hetero prefered) would be able to create a productive permaculture garden that sells its extra produce to a cooperative owned food processing facility.
    Each 'garden' would be ~10 acres/4 hectares in size.

    To get around the need for a Midas Milligan, buying an insurance policy contract that acts like a mortgage - you don't need to be fully funded up front, but the contracts create a pool that can be used as collateral against development finance.

    To gain concessions for the business conglomerate, we need to help the state deal with its problems in a constructive manner.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
    Hi Ho folks. freedomforall sent me a blurb on a possibility: Chatham Island off the SE of NZ. about 250 km or 150 mi.
    I contacted the agents handling the property. Took them awhile to get back to me. Upshot is looks like a nice piece of property (asking NZ $5,000,000 or US $3,164,324). Encompasses most of western peninsula (equals an area of about 10 sq. mi. (if my math is reasonable. freedomforall, check me on this, please) Property is agriculturally sustainable and offers some other developmental opportunities. There seems to be a variety of sporting and some cultural activities on the island. Now, if I can figure out how to attach the e-mail download to this, you all can see that at which I am looking. (HA! Correct grammar strikes again.)

    http://mail.airmail.net/email/scripts...

    I hope this works.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh stop it. A small island can be wiped out by a hurricane, and any country with the smallest military and a little gumption/irritation/agenda.

    If we are going this route, I'd upscope again and plan for Mars.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Doing a good deed? Nope. This is all for me.

    I view squaring away such a population and securing a tangible, resource-rich location with some scope as good for me, and good for the rest of us.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 3 months ago
    What's the price per buildable area of these two places? I looked into this a year ago, and found even in remote locations it runs in the $10,000 per buildable acre range. That kind of money would be enough to fix up some hotels in a remote location and turn them into a conference center / business incubator / resort / retirement home. I have no idea how to execute that. And getting tax abatement deals in exchange for building it would be another project I don't know how to execute. I'm inspired by the idea though.

    The hardest thing, though, is that the human foibles Ayn Rand describes follow you. Peter Keating won't just move there; he'll be on the board of org that builds it. I always thought of that as a problem people would deal with down the road. No. He's there from the very beginning.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      Don't know until I get some more data from a couple of sources I'm pinging. I will probably route them through philosophercat as he has a great deal of experience dealing with this type of project. As soon as I know, I will post up here.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
    Ok, here's one that's off the beaten track:
    Chatham Island
    http://www.nzfarms.co.nz/2571452
    Their description:
    "Approximately 1600 hectares improved pasture, well fenced and organically farmed, running over 10,000 sheep, plus a further 1600 hectares in native fern, just crying out for development.
    Above average infrastructure with two Lockwood houses, raised board shearing shed and shearers quarters.
    Approximately 23km boundary to sea coast, with great fishing and diving."

    The website for the property:
    http://waitangiwest-station.co.nz/Abo...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by gcarl615 9 years, 3 months ago
      Both properties look great. I am curious to know NZ's firearms laws are.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
        The firearms laws in NZ in one sentence: the government has them; the citizens don't.

        NZ is a eco-crazy socialist state. How can anyone in their right mind can even consider investing anything there? It will be duly taken away. If you are going to live in a socialist state, you do not invest there; you plunder, pilage and re-direct to your advantage, as much as you can get away with. Honest investment simply feeds those that follow the formula above.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
          Actually, thanks to New Zealand one entrepreneur that the US media nazis wanted to crush, one Kim Dotcom, was protected from US prosecutors who had no grounds to prosecute. He is still in business and still has all his NZ property afaik.
          NZ does have its Nazis, too, but they are trivial compared to the US version. I didn't like the NZ firearms laws particularly since they would make resistance by the people very difficult in an emergency. Perhaps, all the residents of Atlantis would have to be deputized and required to be armed by their elected sherrif.
          Wherever Atlantis goes there will be challenges. I'd rather spend resources on getting liberty than wasting them on reinventing the wheel from scratch in a wilderness with no infrastructure (and no sovereignty from the local govt. No local govt is going to give sovereignty without significant incentives.) NZ has been much more negotiable with the native minority which may leave another option that doesn't exist elsewhere. However, I have no irrational attraction to NZ either.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
            In my opinion, if there is any hope of a realistic Atlantis in our lifetime, it would have to be either purchased from a failed state or built in some unwanted location. In any case, it would have to be organized and "incorporated" as an independent country, with its own constirution and defense. The best option to making it happen is an involvement by liberty-minded billionaire.

            What I find strange in the earlier discussions here is the desire for total self-sufficiency. Why? No country of earth is self-sufficient. Nor is there a need for it. You produce what you're good at producing, sell it and buy what you're not good at producing. Instead of hidding behind the flat part of the Earth, be accessible, have trade, have communications and have a military capable of defending it all. An environment with liberal constitution, minimal government and capitalist values should be sifficient to bring in outside business, grow your own and retain it.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 3 months ago
              Self sufficiency in requirements for life itself (food, water, energy, air for example) can improve survival risk probability given how frequent certain countries/elites use trade blockades as a weapon. Having a military capable of offense to defeat such tactics results in temptation to use it offensively. Perhaps Atlanteans could avoid such temptation, but I'd prefer to keep the military limited to strong enough defense capability to make attack by enemies far too expensive to consider. That leaves political attack such as blockades. Self sufficiency in certain things blunts the effect of such attacks. I agree that trade with other countries that recognize our sovereignty is very desirable.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
                I would postulate that a military tasked with defense needs to be capable of offense.
                Short of a naval blockade, half measures like embargo are not very effective, except perhaps in raising prices. I agree that self-sufficiency is good, but it comes down to the degree that is acceptable.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by gcarl615 9 years, 3 months ago
          I did some research on NZ after I made this comment. I agree with you 100%. If I wanted to surrender my 2nd Amendment rights and my pride as a producer, I would vote for Hillary. I'll pass on NZ.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by upston 9 years, 3 months ago
    Hi All,
    This is great work and the selections are wonderful examples of whats out there, literally thousands to pick from. Like going to the moon the mission is fraught with challenges and dangers but with focus and determination all the physical needs can easily be satisfied.

    The elephant in the room is MONEY. " If wishes were horses beggars would ride" Every objection raised, utilities , defense , transportation on and on is easy if you have $$$$$.
    How to raise funds , big $ is the trick we need to address to move this from window shopping to action. The only thing I have come up with is some kind of crowd sourcing method , ????

    Ideas ???
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 3 months ago
    Some Egyptian Billionaire just offered to buy an island in the Med as a refuge for Muslims.

    So it must be possible.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
      Two fundamental differences: 1) Billionaire. 2) For the Muslims. Europe is bending backwards (literally) to please the Muslims. We, on the other hand, will be considered a threat. Besides, he didn't ask for sovereignty. No need, due to point 2).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by philosophercat 9 years, 3 months ago
      It will be driven by religious belief until he gets tired of supporting the moochers then he will cut the funding and be assassinated. Unless it is a place where people with money and brains will pay for the chance to be there it will fail. This market will have many choices of where to live. How many want to home school or will the billionaire pay for schools and teachers.
      Why put their lives and fortunes at the whim of a billionaire who finally will throw in your towel. Who do you know that you would trust to be sure food, fuel, medicine, and life basics were there for your family. That's the beauty of a free market it ensures what you need is right there. Not even Bill Gates can replace a free market.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 3 months ago
        I kinda of got the impression it was for Palestinian types and some form of camp where they could keep them out of sight, out of mind, and away from embarrassing the others. Either that or use them for cannon fodder. Hard to beat the draft when you live on an island.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
    This is not for me. One hurricane or big wave and we are gone. Agree with others, too expensive and tenuous.

    How about Venezuela?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      Don't have a source for land on the interior and there are no islands available. Thoughts?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
        Unstable country. Ready for leadership. Nice place. Plenty of land.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
          Any leads as to where to look for possibilities?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
            Sorry, I'm not being clear. I am thinking very big. I mean the country, Venezuela, the whole country.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
              Hoo-Whee!!! Talk about a big bite. Biggest problem I see is the indigenous population AND the government. They won't want to let go very easily and policing the criminal component would be far our capabilities.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
                Clearly the government will resist. That is the first problem. The people are a different story. Either carve out a small gulch, or institute an oligarchy. Either way it would be much more stable after "transition".

                Are their really so few of us, with so little resource?
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
                  How are you planning on eliminating 10 million people that have no concept of work, no education and are expecting a government handout?
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
                    Eliminating? No. Liberating, and putting to work. Reverse process of the communist manifesto.
                    Remove present government (nasty and hard). Set up oligarchy. Set up businesses to employ people and make money (should be very easy to pay better than they have now). Set up temporary minimalist welfare for people not wanting to work for a business, where basic food and minimal pay is offered in return for government labor. Provide obvious benefit of working for business.
                    on and on.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
                      If you were to start with a new generation, say from kindergarten, then that might work. In this case, you have 33 million people, most of whom have no concept of work, entrepreneurship or liberty. They are slaves. You do not liberate slaves in a day and expect them to become citizens. Bush has already tried that in Iraq, among many other attempts, with the same futility. In a failed state like Venezuela, a few will be glad for the change, some will adapt adequately enough, and perhaps 10 million or more will just sit on the street and either die or join a "liberation" army. And there'll be plenty of outside powers funding the "liberation," as it will be a threat to the socialist world.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
                        Who said anything about a day? This will take a long time for those guys. In the meantime, we'll have a capitalist society. If they join a liberation socialist army, well, that resolves a bunch of mouths to feed,
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
                          I would prefer to avoid another Arab / Israeli conflict.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
                            Understood.

                            I think a tiny gulch is unsustainable. I want a real country. Not concerned about stepping on some toes
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                            • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
                              I see a number of comments regarding size. I don't see why a very small country is necessarily unsustainable. Not saying that it is; just don't understand or see any big show stoppers if the territory is small. I don't think that Atlantis needs to be self sufficient in everything. We produce and sell those items or services that we excel in, and buy what we don't excel in.
                              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                              • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
                                Small is ok. Tiny island isn't. Don't think there is a "small" place that doesn't require dis placing a population. Therefore, why not a big one in turmoil needing help
                                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                                • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 3 months ago
                                  I hope these thoughts occur to multiple people and maybe they'll form a federation in the future.
                                  -A business incubator that sets up in a remote location under a tax abatement program and enjoys surprising success and turns into a veritable city-state
                                  - a colony of eccentric retirees on their remote island
                                  -people building infrastructure for researchers in Antarctica, which currently doesn't belong to one single nation state
                                  -a troubled nation state (e.g. Venezuela) looking for a good model of government.
                                  -a space station.
                                  All that sounds fantastical, but so does building a powerful nation based on the ideas of great philosophers in a remote corner of the world.
                                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                                  • Thoritsu replied 9 years, 3 months ago
                                • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
                                  The ones in turmoil don't need help. They need a handout. That's why they're in turmoil. You're thinking of doing a good deed - sorry, but that's a waste of effort. It takes generations for people to learn anything.
                                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                                  • Thoritsu replied 9 years, 3 months ago
                • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
                  Most of us are older, with the concomitant health problems, limited income (pensioners) and with ties to family here. Going to a place where those ties are virtually cut off is bordering on impossible to most. A saving grace to all of this is, because most of us are older, we are more aware of the work ethic, and have the skill sets needed, to raise up a community from almost bare ground. There are some young whippersnappers out there who recognize the challenge and can measure up. But not enough, I'm thinking. Yes, financial resources are sparse and suitable locales are few and expensive. Perseverance is our best weapon. For now. We might even get lucky and someone win the lottery or we find a willing MM to provide the seed to finally get this into action.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo