Atlantis locales
jbrenner and I have been privately discussing Atlantis locales and he suggested I bring a couple to the table for discussion. Based on my research last year, and my decided preference, I offer these two locales for your information:
http://www.privateislandsonline.com/c...
http://www.privateislandsonline.com/c...
One is much larger, more desirable and, unsurprisingly, more expensive. It, however, offers more area for expansion as the community would grow. Both offer freehold status, though autonomy may be a bit harder to negotiate. Methinks commercial (read resort) development might be a possible income source though that would make the property more desirable for appropriation by an inimical entity bent on depredation.
Enough from me. Have at it, y'all.
http://www.privateislandsonline.com/c...
http://www.privateislandsonline.com/c...
One is much larger, more desirable and, unsurprisingly, more expensive. It, however, offers more area for expansion as the community would grow. Both offer freehold status, though autonomy may be a bit harder to negotiate. Methinks commercial (read resort) development might be a possible income source though that would make the property more desirable for appropriation by an inimical entity bent on depredation.
Enough from me. Have at it, y'all.
They are both in Fiji, imo, too far from the families of the Americans we would hope to attract to Atlantis.
Assuming that tourism is your initial primary industry, nearest airport is 102 miles from Vanua Levu. Have you found any info on what is involved in getting to the islands from there?
Fiji has a history of nationalizing industry and frequent coups. It's 1990 constitution " institutionalises ethnic Fijian domination of the political system."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...
Fiji has only been democratic since Sept 2014, so there is little evidence that will continue. Per an Aussie government site, Fiji government receives about $120 million in foreign aid in total, 52% from Australia. However, China pledged $167 million in grants and loans on 2007.Chinese companies have also invested in mining industry in Fiji.
Military aid is received from Australia, the People's Republic of China.
Army:
2000 troops, 2/3 stationed in Fiji, 1/3 on UN missions in middle east.
Navy:
3 Pacific class patrol boat (Australia, displacement 162 t, length 31,5 m, width 8,1 m, draught 1,8 m, power 2 x 1,050 kW, maximal speed 20 knots (37 km/h), crew 17 man, equipment machine guns 1 x 12,7 mm.
2 patrol boat (USA, displacement 97 t, crew 11 man, equipment machine guns 1 x 12,7 mm)
4 Dabur class patrol boat (Israel, displacement 39 t, crew 9 man, equipment 2 x cannon 20 mm, 2 x machine guns 7,62)
Air wing: disbanded in 1997
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republi...
Some details of military coups also on that link.
I have also worked on the tourism problem as the basis of island economies and have a solution which I am just getting ready for a start up. If you guys can put up the 200 million in venture capital money to buy the islands, build the landing fields, docks and harbor, fuel storage stores, housing, medevac, power, water, communications labor supply etc then I can show you that these islands are too small. There is a reason they are vacant of natives. I was on the resort council as a ski area planner at the Urban Land Institute and looked at feasibility studies from all over the world.
I also was headhunted by Disney on taking charge of their undeveloped lands but had not been in a corp. I can show you much more feasible locations that will produce a profit while paying for all the infrastructure and enable you survive.
Just for fun read David McCullough's book Champlain's Dream about the French attempt to settle Canada. The Jurassic Park movies aren't a bad reality check either.
The last piece of land I ran was 55,000 acres. Now I pick apples, cut wood, ski, and write philosophy, but I know how to do it. Have to have learned something in making people happy on remote lands. Hawaii was a good example. Good Luck.
To be economically net positive it needs to be a location eventually for types of enterprises hard to launch or run without strangling levels of regulation elsewhere.
But very very few new townships become economically viable within a mere five years without something very valuable being created or exploited near at hand. I wouldn't worry much about that for at least 10 years as long as the foundations are being laid and the right people are being attracted.
Welcome to the melee. Agree with your points. A very large parcel is necessary to become as self sufficient as possible. Infrastructure can be built on an as needed basis, except a fresh water source. Which is why I look for large islands. Not too many available. Those that are have some population and probably would be unwilling to put up with us. One of the best opportunities I saw was a peninsula on Vanua Levu, Fiji which was offered last year but..... . If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. Thanks for the input and keep watching. You never can tell, something may break loose.
What are the most important criteria to use in finding the site, in your opinion?
Is this a pertinent question:
What size is the minimum in acres, if it is not an island, but has capability of sea shipping?
Panama has a problem, as most Central and South American countries, with sudden and violent governmental change. Getting caught in the crossfire is not my idea of fun. True, some are more stable than others but the propensity to nationalize anything of value happens all too often. Having lived most of my life close to the southern border, I tend to pay a lot of attention to stuff like that.
Panama's stability is much better than Fiji, there are tax advantages there, and residency requirements are low. I considered moving to Panama seriously about 7 years ago and decided not to do so at that time, but if there had been a Gulch community possible my decision would have been different, I think.
Panama also has very significant advantages in transportation, first world internet capabilities and infrastructure, and a low cost work force for construction of Atlantis. I'm not saying it's ideal, but I'd take it over Fiji. We really need to define the parameters for comparison though, or there will be little progress in finding a site for Atlantis.
http://www.nzfarms.co.nz has a lot of listings.
http://www.nzfarms.co.nz/2496182
Here's a few more:
http://www.nzfarms.co.nz/2512714
http://www.nzfarms.co.nz/2634549
http://www.nzfarms.co.nz/2624545: I guess 'tender' means 'make an offer'.
360 ha = about 900 acres
Granted, there are some issues with sovereignty and political instability. However, no matter where you go, there will be issues of these natures to deal with. As to the distance involved, for me, it is one of the plusses. The original Atlantis from AS, made itself, basically, technologically separate. Since we do not have that ability at the present time, the option is to do it geographically. There will be no perfect locale for our Atlantis. The best we can do is take all the criteria and see which one matches the most. I guess I'm not as opposed to being in a faraway place. Hell, I'd even take the trip to Mars, if they would let me.
However, nothing is remote enough on earth to dissuade the US military and the UN busybodies, when there is a local government that wants to crush a secession, which is the only way Atlantis gets true liberty from the nation it settles in.
Unless you have a Midas with deep pockets and more respect for liberty than need for power/control, It will be more important to have a location that has a more reasonable land cost, better existing facilities and transportation to enable construction at reasonable cost, and shorter travel time for relatives of those who value liberty enough to immigrate to Atlantis. The latter is less important to me than the cost issues, but other producers may wish to maintain stronger ties to home. If recruiting is important to Atlantis, the distance may be a very important factor.
(Midas didn't build the Gulch by paying $30,000/acre for remote land without infrastructure or transportation. He picked land that was within a few hours by plane, albeit isolated. OTOH, he didn't expect to be there permanently.)
if the concept interests you.
But a Gulch like retreat with suitable protections against outsiders knowing what it is may be more doable. But its continuing survival and lack of detection cannot be guaranteed.
Could our refuge be somehow inexpensive to get to? By boat perhaps. I would like the ability to bring my tools and other supplies I would deem necessary to build a new life. I don't believe our stay in the Gulch will be short nor easy. The better supplied initially the better off we would be, not to mention independent of the corrupt world.
I know the challenges of this whole idea of a real time Gulch are great and I respect you guys for taking it on I live in the upper Midwest of the US. I have seriously looked at moving to the Redoubt that James Rawles seems to have somewhat established in the upper part of the western states. However, The sheer logistics of packing up and moving to an informal Gulch still within the US borders is daunting at best.
I wish you guys success with this, please keep us informed
As I have iterated earlier, there is no perfect place. I keep searching for someplace that is far enough away from everyone else we wouldn't be disturbed too much but, the world being as it is, every place is claimed by someone. The best we can hope for is being innocuous enough (and prickly enough) no one wants to bother with us, the cost/benefit ratio being too high for the trouble. WOW, all this started by asking what kind of tools. Wonder what would have happened had I asked a REALLY serious question?
(This is from a neophyte, not an expert in power generation, using internet sources.)
It also becomes a very tempting target for enemies.
http://exclusiveview.knightfrank.com....
Pick a place to start a business with Gulch members being considered as prefered stockholders.
Have you heard of 'strata titling'? Apparently it is where all of the units of an apartment building get recorded as private residences. These can subsequently be bought and sold based on the calculations of the owners.
In Australia we have a self-managed super fund scheme, I think that the best way to describe it to Americans is a 401k controlled by the individual that it affects.
I would like to create an agricultural business that focuses on 'industrial-scale organic agriculture' each resident (+family - multiple generation hetero prefered) would be able to create a productive permaculture garden that sells its extra produce to a cooperative owned food processing facility.
Each 'garden' would be ~10 acres/4 hectares in size.
To get around the need for a Midas Milligan, buying an insurance policy contract that acts like a mortgage - you don't need to be fully funded up front, but the contracts create a pool that can be used as collateral against development finance.
To gain concessions for the business conglomerate, we need to help the state deal with its problems in a constructive manner.
Your Shipbroker-Chandler Extraordinaire
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
Got a spare $50 billion to get started?
Maybe we will have our Midas Mulligan someday. But right now they're making all the money they can before the economy flounders because the Fed are bunch of flounders.
I contacted the agents handling the property. Took them awhile to get back to me. Upshot is looks like a nice piece of property (asking NZ $5,000,000 or US $3,164,324). Encompasses most of western peninsula (equals an area of about 10 sq. mi. (if my math is reasonable. freedomforall, check me on this, please) Property is agriculturally sustainable and offers some other developmental opportunities. There seems to be a variety of sporting and some cultural activities on the island. Now, if I can figure out how to attach the e-mail download to this, you all can see that at which I am looking. (HA! Correct grammar strikes again.)
http://mail.airmail.net/email/scripts...
I hope this works.
The link did not work for me. Error is:
Not Logged In / Session Expired
The reason I said "about 10 sq mi" is I knew 640 acres= 1 section or one sq mi. So, 3200 ha would probably be equivalent to 6400 acres, therefore, 10 sq mi., more or less.
1 hectare = 2.5 acres
3200 ha = 8000 acres (~12.5 sq mi)
If we are going this route, I'd upscope again and plan for Mars.
I view squaring away such a population and securing a tangible, resource-rich location with some scope as good for me, and good for the rest of us.
The hardest thing, though, is that the human foibles Ayn Rand describes follow you. Peter Keating won't just move there; he'll be on the board of org that builds it. I always thought of that as a problem people would deal with down the road. No. He's there from the very beginning.
Chatham Island
http://www.nzfarms.co.nz/2571452
Their description:
"Approximately 1600 hectares improved pasture, well fenced and organically farmed, running over 10,000 sheep, plus a further 1600 hectares in native fern, just crying out for development.
Above average infrastructure with two Lockwood houses, raised board shearing shed and shearers quarters.
Approximately 23km boundary to sea coast, with great fishing and diving."
The website for the property:
http://waitangiwest-station.co.nz/Abo...
NZ is a eco-crazy socialist state. How can anyone in their right mind can even consider investing anything there? It will be duly taken away. If you are going to live in a socialist state, you do not invest there; you plunder, pilage and re-direct to your advantage, as much as you can get away with. Honest investment simply feeds those that follow the formula above.
NZ does have its Nazis, too, but they are trivial compared to the US version. I didn't like the NZ firearms laws particularly since they would make resistance by the people very difficult in an emergency. Perhaps, all the residents of Atlantis would have to be deputized and required to be armed by their elected sherrif.
Wherever Atlantis goes there will be challenges. I'd rather spend resources on getting liberty than wasting them on reinventing the wheel from scratch in a wilderness with no infrastructure (and no sovereignty from the local govt. No local govt is going to give sovereignty without significant incentives.) NZ has been much more negotiable with the native minority which may leave another option that doesn't exist elsewhere. However, I have no irrational attraction to NZ either.
What I find strange in the earlier discussions here is the desire for total self-sufficiency. Why? No country of earth is self-sufficient. Nor is there a need for it. You produce what you're good at producing, sell it and buy what you're not good at producing. Instead of hidding behind the flat part of the Earth, be accessible, have trade, have communications and have a military capable of defending it all. An environment with liberal constitution, minimal government and capitalist values should be sifficient to bring in outside business, grow your own and retain it.
Short of a naval blockade, half measures like embargo are not very effective, except perhaps in raising prices. I agree that self-sufficiency is good, but it comes down to the degree that is acceptable.
Here's a satellite pic of the island:
www.google.com/maps/place/Chatham+Isl....
Guess I'll send an e-mail to see what's what.
http://www.landwatch.com/Jequetepeque...
P'cat, what do you think? A bit pricey but the development potential looks pretty good.
This is great work and the selections are wonderful examples of whats out there, literally thousands to pick from. Like going to the moon the mission is fraught with challenges and dangers but with focus and determination all the physical needs can easily be satisfied.
The elephant in the room is MONEY. " If wishes were horses beggars would ride" Every objection raised, utilities , defense , transportation on and on is easy if you have $$$$$.
How to raise funds , big $ is the trick we need to address to move this from window shopping to action. The only thing I have come up with is some kind of crowd sourcing method , ????
Ideas ???
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
So it must be possible.
Why put their lives and fortunes at the whim of a billionaire who finally will throw in your towel. Who do you know that you would trust to be sure food, fuel, medicine, and life basics were there for your family. That's the beauty of a free market it ensures what you need is right there. Not even Bill Gates can replace a free market.
How about Venezuela?
Are their really so few of us, with so little resource?
Remove present government (nasty and hard). Set up oligarchy. Set up businesses to employ people and make money (should be very easy to pay better than they have now). Set up temporary minimalist welfare for people not wanting to work for a business, where basic food and minimal pay is offered in return for government labor. Provide obvious benefit of working for business.
on and on.
I think a tiny gulch is unsustainable. I want a real country. Not concerned about stepping on some toes
-A business incubator that sets up in a remote location under a tax abatement program and enjoys surprising success and turns into a veritable city-state
- a colony of eccentric retirees on their remote island
-people building infrastructure for researchers in Antarctica, which currently doesn't belong to one single nation state
-a troubled nation state (e.g. Venezuela) looking for a good model of government.
-a space station.
All that sounds fantastical, but so does building a powerful nation based on the ideas of great philosophers in a remote corner of the world.
http://www.privateislandsonline.com/i...
http://www.privateislandsonline.com/i...
Hope this is better.
The lazy retired old dino came out of me.
http://www.iom.int/world-migration