Road Work Ahead: What’s Next in the Gulch?
Since the release of “Atlas Shrugged: Who is John Galt?”, many of you have asked “what’s happening with Galt’s Gulch? Is Galt’s Gulch going away?”
With over 18,000 registered members, Galt’s Gulch Online is now the world’s largest and most active online Objectivist community. And, we're not going anywhere.
We are however going to be undergoing some renovations here in the Gulch and we want your feedback.
1.) What do you like most about Galt’s Gulch?
2.) What do you like least about Galt’s Gulch?
3.) What new features would you like to see?
It's not the end... it's the beginning.
With over 18,000 registered members, Galt’s Gulch Online is now the world’s largest and most active online Objectivist community. And, we're not going anywhere.
We are however going to be undergoing some renovations here in the Gulch and we want your feedback.
1.) What do you like most about Galt’s Gulch?
2.) What do you like least about Galt’s Gulch?
3.) What new features would you like to see?
It's not the end... it's the beginning.
2. The occasional trolls, but without them, I 'm sure I would miss some of the laughs.
3. I would like it if you could change the gray vertical line styles so I could follow the conversations easier. If you were to alternate the columns with solid and dashed lines or different colors... just a thought...
P.S. One more thing: Since we have been limited on edit time I have felt the desire for an option to add a P.S. to our original post so that we might make notes of correction or addendum without adding another separate entry.
I do LOVE the way that my email updates on comments take me exactly to the response to one of my posts.
It doesn't always work.
I wish there was a way to follow specific conversations and just see the new posts there.
That it exists.
2.) What do you like least about Galt’s Gulch?
That it is virtual.
3.) What new features would you like to see?
Holographic projection to hide our location.
Kind of like voting up or down on a post.
In this way, newbies can know at a glance if they are dealing with someone legit or not.
the other day a whole thread erupted after a comment by someone with _2_ points to their 'name.'
kind of the same reason I'd like to see the "who is this person" ID at the TOP of a 'letter to the editor' and not way down at the bottom. Transparency? Truth in advertising?
:)
2. YES!
3. YES, with vicious cyber dogs to eat the trolls.
I think that I've been termed a troll at various times.
Some topics beg for a longer, and more detailed response. So troll on!
One thing I could do without are the occasional moocher "trolls" who intrude into ongoing threads with nauseatingly long and irrelevant posts. Thankfully, these have been few and far between of late. The religious proselytizers seem to have gone away as well.
I like the daily e-mail for what is hot in the Gulch. Maybe we could have another that we sign up for that alerts us when a thread receives a certain number of comments in a short period of time.
Like least: News reporters without comments or relativity to Objectivism.
New features: An easier way to follow threads within posts.
Great site, keep it going!!!
2.) What do you like least about Galt’s Gulch? Some really good discussions fall way down to where you cannot see them. Perhaps a "featured discussion" or "featured topics" section would be good?
3.) What new features would you like to see?
Again, the "Featured Topics" or just like the Movie Meetups, using the same feature you could have Gulchers set up their own regular meetups in their area.
Thanks so much Soogoo. No 3rd party platform here. It's home baked 100% here in the Gulch.
2)keeping track of long threads
3)"member since..."
IM or chat room feature
My feedback is this. I would like to know if Galt's Gulch Online is turning a profit? 18,000 registered users is impressive, but how many of those are 'producers' and does the revenue cover your expense such as your time and the web developer's salary? I think it is nice that there is a $4 membership available because that may be the level that some people wish to contribute, but Galt's Gulch Online means more to me than that and I would elect to contribute more if it had been an option signing up. So my suggestion is, if Galt's Gulch Online is income-constrained in any way or if the people who are making it happen are volunteering their time or not being compensated, then let's talk about that.
2) (intentionally left blank...until I filled it with this.)
3) A score board (de ja vu) which shows a member's stats ie; List of member names, Date they joined, last logged in, most recent comment/post, highest rated post/comment...
A small enhancement:
Allow the original poster the opportunity to modify the original title, link, and comments. This would help all-thumbs (or rushed) typists without having to delete and reenter the entire topic. It would also allow correction of links that fail. You might have to add a clickable option to "open original text" when changes were made after comments were posted , too.
(This is knit-picking though. I hope there will be lots of better projects for enhancements.)
The format of the site is awkward. Many other forum formats would be an improvement. Invision offers some you could check out.
http://community.invisionpower.com/
It would be great to have increased text formatting options and the ability to easily capture a quote of a previous reply.
2. Pettiness
3. Focus less on who gets what points, too high school, and more on organized sharing of thoughts, whether we all agree or not. Sometimes having a dissenter makes us think and dig deeper into our Objectivism. Otherwise, I thing the design and philosophy of the website is first rates.
I am sure you have your reasons but it is frustrating that I cannot "Thumbs-up (or down)" someone's posting or comment. Maybe ease a little on the requirements?
I think it would be cool to be able to start groups. Like a local group, for instance. I would like to join a local group for lunch or coffee or go to Objectivist-themed events.
I'd propose some slight alterations in the categories for new posts.
I'd put Entertainment in with News or Culture - I rarely see anyone post anything to this one at all.
I'd combine Government and Legislation.
I'd also like to see a section for trending conversations on the right to replace the Top Points Earners (always the same people - BORING) and the "Members and Lurkers" (move somewhere else) sections.
In general, I prefer the Gulch to any of the other online forums I participate in - primarily because the people are generally more polite and thoughtful. I think that counts as much as the design.
1) On my phone and monitor, the outline style makes it easy to see what responses occur to which post, and I like that.
2) On my (Fire HD) tablet, replies are not in outline form; they appear in some random order and the replies are labeled, "in reply to <post>". This makes seeing the post order almost impossible without clicking on a link. Is there a way to do away with this?
2. Just not everyday, maybe once a week.
Site navigation has never seemed appealing or easy to me, such as finding a specific comment or the process of determining a category to list a new comment under...
How about a feature where we can either flag a comment for the thread's owner or administrator or empower (some?) of us to be able to move posts like the one I'm replying to here... to another category? Like from "road work ahead" to "movie-related questions", etc?
Thanks!
-not being there...
2. Condescension
3. Tap Talk - So we can communicate with our mobile devices
Load more comments...