House Passes Bill to Force Schools to Let Biological Males into Girls’ Restrooms, Locker Rooms, Dressing Rooms

Posted by $ AJAshinoff 3 years, 8 months ago to Culture
15 comments | Share | Flag

Degenerates are running this country. Not flashers and gropers but sex slavers and pedophiles. This violates no many aspects of society and private business ownership and there are few if any in either party willing to stand in defense of innocence..
SOURCE URL: https://www.cnsnews.com/article/washington/cnsnewscom-staff/house-passes-bill-force-schools-let-biological-males-girls


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mccannon01 3 years, 8 months ago
    If an adult Napoleon fantasizes being a Josephine or an adult Josephine fantasizes being a Napoleon, that is their business. However, when government is petitioned to force acceptance of the fantasy upon minors and the population at large, that is evil.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 3 years, 8 months ago
    Hope the Senate has some sense on the day this comes up or better yet, finds it's way into the circular file!

    But in the bigger picture, not that it seems to make much of a difference, Isn't that Unconstitutional?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 3 years, 8 months ago
    I'll bet you weren't aware of a big difference in male and female. When a gastrointestinal doctor repairs an inguinal hernia on a male, he has to install mesh to reinforce the intestine. Not so on a female, God took care of that for us.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 3 years, 8 months ago
    Not one of those House members has daughters of school age apparently.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by CircuitGuy 3 years, 8 months ago
      My daughter is 10-y/o and has no inkling in her personality to want to make someone feel uncomfortable for being different.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Lucky 3 years, 8 months ago
        The human sex drive is based on difference.
        10 year old males have committed and have been been convicted of rape.

        Sexual violence (male/female) is not due to someone being made to feel different, it is based on the perpetrator actually being different from the victim.
        This difference is not just a voluntary idea lurking in the personality whatever that is, it is caused by real different body parts which sends messages to the brain. Messages depend on physical difference. In the immature these messages are commands.

        People differ in height, weight and intelligence.
        Some people are so stupid that they impose harm on themselves and their families. These people are different and should feel uncomfortable until cured or confined.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by CircuitGuy 3 years, 8 months ago
          Sexual violence is a different topic from bigotry. Thankfully both are getting better. Curing, confining, or otherwise violating people's rights are all on the decline.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 3 years, 8 months ago
            Not American CG? Seems that thingy called the Bill of Rights is being trampled. And that thingy, the Bill of Rights, applies to anyone regardless of sex or metal condition. What we're seeing is the degradation and decimation of the entire Constitution. That impact everyone, including future generations, who won't be able to regain those natural rights without bloodshed, and maybe no even then.

            Explain?
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by CircuitGuy 3 years, 6 months ago
              "Explain?"
              I say things are getting better, and most people who follow policy say that is tantamount to excusing cases where people's rights are not respected. Maybe the point about the trend is moot b/c I firmly believe we should protect human rights without regard to how fast things are getting better or worse.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ 3 years, 6 months ago
                That's the issue entirely. You can not legislate societal change or a deviant groups respect. Society and its dispositions are matters of the heart not law. You push law on people to force acceptance and you only foment resentment and ultimately rejection. As I said the Constitution encompasses all men and women, regardless or who and what they choose to be or how they act.

                Piling up laws, especially ridiculous ones, are just a way for one group to punish another. Unconstitutional laws are moot and are fit to be ignored. Push that with force and there will be blood.

                You and I have talked for quite a while. I know we disagree on key things. Even so, I'm kind stupefied I have to explain this to you. If we can't have the Constitution has a common foundation then there is no sense discussing because you reject a fundamental premise of what it means to be American.

                Tolerance is all that is required by the Constitution. Tolerance doesn't mean acceptance, it is simply affording others the basic respect to enjoy life, liberty and pursuit of what makes them happy, just as you do.

                Before you go off on my use of the word deviant please look up its meaning.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by CircuitGuy 3 years, 6 months ago
                  I think you may be misunderstanding. I am saying that the fact that things are getting better does not mean things are perfect.
                  This point may not be related to what you're saying. It seems to me that to most people if I say something is decreasing, e.g. spousal abuse, most people think, "there are still people being abused. But you're saying it's getting better, so that means you're fine with the level of abuse we have now." It's like the only way you can take something serious is to act like it's getting worse.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 3 years, 8 months ago
    This is a hard issue because, according to the article, this bill would make people in rural regions live in a way they don’t want to live. If it were preventing them from jailing transgendered people, I would obviously support it unequivocally. Even though I don’t agree with them, it seems reasonable that people in some places would want spaces with people separated by sex or sex assigned at birth for intersex people.

    I think there is some minority of people who would like to use government force to come to Madison and make some more kids feel uncomfortable by not recognizing their gender. But this bill seems like the same thing in reverse, people from the city making a rule that makes rural people uncomfortable. People should be left alone. They could come to Madison, where all institutions are very supportive LGBTQ rights.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 3 years, 8 months ago
      Trying to make people accept and see as normal people with a mental deficiency is a violation of reality. Doing so means that A does not equal A. A man is a man. A woman is a woman.

      Regardless of mental deficiencies every single person in this country has a natural right to life, liberty and the peruit of their individual happiness. No special laws are needed for this as its inherent in the Constitution.

      The fedgov has no business shaping society by using law. Doing so only further invalidates the federal government entitlement to govern.In America that is not remotely its role.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 3 years, 8 months ago
        "Trying to make people accept and see as normal people with a mental deficiency is a violation of reality. "
        That's sort of my point. You can't make people accept one another.

        My reading of the Constitution is things should be left to the local gov'ts, as long as they don't stand in the way of people traveling or trading within the country. I would NEVER want to live in the parts where the group defines normal and deficient. I am from one of the parts open to weird individuals trying crazy ideas. The people who reject me as mentally deficient mostly leave me alone when I'm travelling through, and the fed gov't absolutely should leave them alone too.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo